From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560B41F404 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 18:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727626AbeIEWuT (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2018 18:50:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:39705 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727426AbeIEWuT (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Sep 2018 18:50:19 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id o37-v6so8654445wrf.6 for ; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 11:18:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=EG1lbV82EQD4EcONbRZkigdIEqKAcFXcCXGhy1XD2iw=; b=BEHdYOm0JKineJcT3JwpQgYuV9vGRo5o/BRb65R0s8Fg7lr36hgjQvGGeqMR5b1Y4Z o0aoN4T1fWtTczoT3g0kRoJ7LNbxeRy3S7Hs/n8H70n1/5dY8suShEn/Z8cs7G2O+iod Pfs95DOuq7YCq85ap0gt8DhR3U4ZyKgjtv5+4aNlxUjhakeHldvhrK+8QS7IpRwasXhG z865x64+ReHmmPNsDYNWDrInSGJpeucyvN97VsD6IvlmxXkE5XzTUKB8Bw/CPrxrKnv/ d6Jby+SmwGoHlLXpv0p/vezDoS+CQbqtb4C0NW9j/XD8MZo0eanfN9zUmJ3nbYzXcxKM OoHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=EG1lbV82EQD4EcONbRZkigdIEqKAcFXcCXGhy1XD2iw=; b=Od/QtzOTYdMxDjU/CVdiAcmCZ/0wE9YrhRHo0IZJkrgXwwEIuOf8+orFzWiIkg8WUD kSw6SrZ4dbKU9Rsvu4TWljSadbmfja2gixFDOCLpFsl246z68Y47qRRTFC5UirjrQ6En rrk4T5JPjB+MrOCN6+18/BsDBT7yDQkQsv1DWxfF+deh5/YBLXi1uudKrp614AKcpab3 EntRHT/2kdd6MfNkDeVdAO5EDmo7asmlBcZG5XnyrPpnzVdS9XLjp1lqvX/bppiJ0h1u M6JJ5Ics4pbBdKOOdmZMz/0Px9gVeN6gy5VAJnFn+olbdQ/Jd0UUO619rnlm/n6FZ94l Kp5g== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BHVrAFfVLT2R5iyoUzBu/oMZgHFkJ5jd+vXbIN2zcbrEvfJMaw 4MdF937VtDm5VkeUJSljNt0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYVS6RQwGANYbHfspPk/1KDwx8kRGsPvzEpZiOO3bN8UL3aNXU2FufqP0D2xrql9bAxmuUEVA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:8325:: with SMTP id 34-v6mr17575707wrd.67.1536171538173; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 11:18:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (x590e0517.dyn.telefonica.de. [89.14.5.23]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k63-v6sm3445809wmd.46.2018.09.05.11.18.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Sep 2018 11:18:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2018 20:18:52 +0200 From: SZEDER =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor?= To: Duy Nguyen Cc: Junio C Hamano , Git Mailing List , Thomas Gummerer Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2018, #01; Tue, 4) Message-ID: <20180905181852.GA14181@localhost> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 06:48:06PM +0200, Duy Nguyen wrote: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 6:35 PM Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > Junio C Hamano writes: > > > > > Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with > > > '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with > > > '+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of > > > the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them. > > > > > > Git 2.19-rc2 is out. Hopefully the tip of 'master' is more or less > > > identical to the final one without needing much updates. > > > > By the way, linux-gcc job of TravisCI seems to have been unhappy > > lately all the way down to 'master'. It fails split-index tests, > > which may or may not be new breakage. > > > > https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/424552273 > > > > If this is a recent regression, we may want to revert a few commits, > > but I do not offhand recall us having touched the spilt-index part > > of the code during this cycle. It's not a regression, it's as old as the split index feature itself. > I can't reproduce it here (with either 64 or 32 bit builds on x86). > Not denying the problem, just a quick update. I'll need more time, > maybe over weekend to have a closer look. I have the patches almost ready, only the commit messages need some touching up.