From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] pack-objects: reuse on-disk deltas for thin "have" objects
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 19:32:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180817233234.GA4472@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kY9o_38WRX2TXC1JMA+9Y_ihf_jK8-f2pcYA+cYPF6B4A@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 03:57:18PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 2:06 PM Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> >
> > When we serve a fetch, we pass the "wants" and "haves" from
> > the fetch negotiation to pack-objects. That tells us not
> > only which objects we need to send, but we also use the
> > boundary commits as "preferred bases": their trees and blobs
> > are candidates for delta bases, both for reusing on-disk
> > deltas and for finding new ones.
> >
> > However, this misses some opportunities. Modulo some special
> > cases like shallow or partial clones, we know that every
> > object reachable from the "haves" could be a preferred base.
> > We don't use them all for two reasons:
>
> s/all/at all/ ?
No, I meant "we don't use all of them". As in the Pokemon "gotta catch
'em all" slogan. ;)
Probably writing out "all of them" is better.
> > The first is that check_object() needs access to the
> > relevant information (the thin flag and bitmap result). We
> > can do this by pushing these into program-lifetime globals.
>
> I discussed internally if extending the fetch protocol to include
> submodule packs would be a good idea, as then you can get all
> the superproject+submodule updates via one connection. This
> gives some benefits, such as a more consistent view from the
> superproject as well as already knowing the have/wants for
> the submodule.
>
> With this background story, moving things into globals
> makes me sad, but I guess we can flip this decision once
> we actually move towards "submodule packs in the
> main connection".
I don't think it significantly changes the existing code, which is
already relying on a ton of globals (most notably to_pack). The first
step in doing multiple packs in the same process is going to be to shove
all of that into a "struct pack_objects_context" or similar, and these
can just follow the rest.
> >
> > The second is that the rest of the code assumes that any
> > reused delta will point to another "struct object_entry" as
> > its base. But by definition, we don't have such an entry!
>
> I got lost here by the definition (which def?).
>
> The delta that we look up from the bitmap, doesn't may
> not be in the pack, but it could be based off of an object
> the client already has in its object store and for that
> there is no struct object_entry in memory.
>
> Is that correct?
Right, we are interested in objects that we _couldn't_ find a struct
for. I agree this could be more clear.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-17 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-17 20:54 [PATCH 0/6] reuse on-disk deltas for fetches with bitmaps Jeff King
2018-08-17 20:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] t/perf: factor boilerplate out of test_perf Jeff King
2018-08-17 20:55 ` [PATCH 2/6] t/perf: factor out percent calculations Jeff King
2018-08-17 20:56 ` [PATCH 3/6] t/perf: add infrastructure for measuring sizes Jeff King
2018-08-17 20:57 ` [PATCH 4/6] t/perf: add perf tests for fetches from a bitmapped server Jeff King
2018-08-17 20:59 ` [PATCH 5/6] pack-bitmap: save "have" bitmap from walk Jeff King
2018-08-17 22:39 ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-17 22:45 ` Jeff King
2018-08-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 6/6] pack-objects: reuse on-disk deltas for thin "have" objects Jeff King
2018-08-17 22:57 ` Stefan Beller
2018-08-17 23:32 ` Jeff King [this message]
2018-08-20 21:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-20 21:42 ` Jeff King
2018-08-21 19:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] reuse on-disk deltas for fetches with bitmaps Jeff King
2018-08-21 19:08 ` Jeff King
2018-08-21 19:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-21 19:51 ` Jeff King
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-08-21 18:41 [PATCH] test-tool.h: include git-compat-util.h Jeff King
2018-08-21 19:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] pack-objects: reuse on-disk deltas for thin "have" objects Jeff King
2018-08-21 19:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-21 19:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-21 20:07 ` Jeff King
2018-08-21 20:14 ` Jeff King
2018-08-21 20:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-21 21:30 ` Jeff King
2018-08-21 20:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-08-21 21:32 ` Jeff King
2018-08-21 20:00 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180817233234.GA4472@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).