git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: 2.18.0 Regression: packing performance and effectiveness
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:16:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180719151640.GA24997@duynguyen.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8BNGboUb0F5NRR9tKj_P24j2ZgB48SCuLEphSHQAU2EUA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 07:57:37AM +0200, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> I thought 2M was generous but I was obviously wrong. I'd like to see
> the biggest delta size in this pack and whether it's still reasonable
> to increase OE_DELTA_SIZE_BITS. But if it's very close to 4GB limit
> then we could just store 64-bit delta size in a separate array.

I realize now that these two options don't have to be mutually
exclusive and I should provide a good fallback in terms of performance
anyway.

So Elijah, could you try this patch and see if performance and pack
size go back to 1.7.0? I can write proper commit message and test
support later if it proves a good improvement.

-- 8< --
diff --git a/builtin/pack-objects.c b/builtin/pack-objects.c
index ebc8cefb53..7f3546057d 100644
--- a/builtin/pack-objects.c
+++ b/builtin/pack-objects.c
@@ -2023,10 +2023,6 @@ static int try_delta(struct unpacked *trg, struct unpacked *src,
 	delta_buf = create_delta(src->index, trg->data, trg_size, &delta_size, max_size);
 	if (!delta_buf)
 		return 0;
-	if (delta_size >= (1U << OE_DELTA_SIZE_BITS)) {
-		free(delta_buf);
-		return 0;
-	}
 
 	if (DELTA(trg_entry)) {
 		/* Prefer only shallower same-sized deltas. */
diff --git a/pack-objects.c b/pack-objects.c
index 92708522e7..191ed45faf 100644
--- a/pack-objects.c
+++ b/pack-objects.c
@@ -160,6 +160,8 @@ struct object_entry *packlist_alloc(struct packing_data *pdata,
 
 		if (!pdata->in_pack_by_idx)
 			REALLOC_ARRAY(pdata->in_pack, pdata->nr_alloc);
+		if (pdata->delta_size)
+			REALLOC_ARRAY(pdata->delta_size, pdata->nr_alloc);
 	}
 
 	new_entry = pdata->objects + pdata->nr_objects++;
@@ -177,3 +179,17 @@ struct object_entry *packlist_alloc(struct packing_data *pdata,
 
 	return new_entry;
 }
+
+void oe_prepare_delta_size_array(struct packing_data *pack)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	/*
+	 * nr_alloc, not nr_objects to align with realloc() strategy in
+	 * packlist_alloc()
+	 */
+	ALLOC_ARRAY(pack->delta_size, pack->nr_alloc);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < pack->nr_objects; i++)
+		pack->delta_size[i] = pack->objects[i].delta_size_;
+}
diff --git a/pack-objects.h b/pack-objects.h
index edf74dabdd..978500e474 100644
--- a/pack-objects.h
+++ b/pack-objects.h
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
  * above this limit. Don't lower it too much.
  */
 #define OE_SIZE_BITS		31
-#define OE_DELTA_SIZE_BITS	20
+#define OE_DELTA_SIZE_BITS	21
 
 /*
  * State flags for depth-first search used for analyzing delta cycles.
@@ -93,7 +93,6 @@ struct object_entry {
 				     * uses the same base as me
 				     */
 	unsigned delta_size_:OE_DELTA_SIZE_BITS; /* delta data size (uncompressed) */
-	unsigned delta_size_valid:1;
 	unsigned in_pack_idx:OE_IN_PACK_BITS;	/* already in pack */
 	unsigned z_delta_size:OE_Z_DELTA_BITS;
 	unsigned type_valid:1;
@@ -130,6 +129,7 @@ struct packing_data {
 	uint32_t index_size;
 
 	unsigned int *in_pack_pos;
+	unsigned long *delta_size;
 
 	/*
 	 * Only one of these can be non-NULL and they have different
@@ -330,20 +330,27 @@ static inline void oe_set_size(struct packing_data *pack,
 static inline unsigned long oe_delta_size(struct packing_data *pack,
 					  const struct object_entry *e)
 {
-	if (e->delta_size_valid)
+	if (!pack->delta_size)
 		return e->delta_size_;
-	return oe_size(pack, e);
+	return pack->delta_size[e - pack->objects];
 }
 
+void oe_prepare_delta_size_array(struct packing_data *pack);
 static inline void oe_set_delta_size(struct packing_data *pack,
 				     struct object_entry *e,
 				     unsigned long size)
 {
 	e->delta_size_ = size;
-	e->delta_size_valid = e->delta_size_ == size;
-	if (!e->delta_size_valid && size != oe_size(pack, e))
-		BUG("this can only happen in check_object() "
-		    "where delta size is the same as entry size");
+	if (!pack->delta_size && e->delta_size_ == size)
+		return;
+	/*
+	 * We have had at least one delta size exceeding OE_DELTA_SIZE_BITS
+	 * limit. delta_size_ will not be used anymore. All delta sizes are now
+	 * from the delta_size[] array.
+	 */
+	if (!pack->delta_size)
+		oe_prepare_delta_size_array(pack);
+	pack->delta_size[e - pack->objects] = size;
 }
 
 #endif
-- 8< --


--
Duy

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-19 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-18 22:51 2.18.0 Regression: packing performance and effectiveness Elijah Newren
2018-07-18 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH] fix-v1: revert "pack-objects: shrink delta_size field in struct object_entry" Elijah Newren
2018-07-18 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH] fix-v2: make OE_DELTA_SIZE_BITS a bit bigger Elijah Newren
2018-07-19  5:41 ` 2.18.0 Regression: packing performance and effectiveness Duy Nguyen
2018-07-19  5:49   ` Jeff King
2018-07-19 15:27   ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-19 15:43     ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-19  5:44 ` Jeff King
2018-07-19  5:57   ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-19 15:16     ` Duy Nguyen [this message]
2018-07-19 16:42       ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-19 17:23         ` Jeff King
2018-07-19 17:31           ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-19 18:24             ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-19 19:17               ` Jeff King
2018-07-19 23:11               ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-20  5:28                 ` Jeff King
2018-07-20  5:30                   ` Jeff King
2018-07-20  5:47                   ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-20 17:21                   ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-19 17:04       ` Jeff King
2018-07-19 19:25       ` Junio C Hamano
2018-07-19 19:27         ` Junio C Hamano
2018-07-20 15:39 ` [PATCH] pack-objects: fix performance issues on packing large deltas Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2018-07-20 17:40   ` Jeff King
2018-07-21  4:23     ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-23 21:37       ` Jeff King
2018-07-20 17:43   ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-20 23:52     ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-21  4:07       ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-21  7:08         ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-21  4:47     ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-21  6:56       ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-21  7:14         ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-22  6:22       ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-22  6:49         ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-23 12:34     ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-23 15:50       ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-22  8:04   ` [PATCH v2] " Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2018-07-23 18:04     ` Junio C Hamano
2018-07-23 18:38       ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-23 18:49         ` Duy Nguyen
2018-07-23 21:30           ` Jeff King
2018-07-26  8:12     ` Johannes Sixt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180719151640.GA24997@duynguyen.home \
    --to=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).