Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] X509 (gpgsm) commit signing support

["brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1619 bytes --]

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 01:12:24PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:52:22AM +0200, Henning Schild wrote:
> > This series can be seen as a follow up of a series that appeared under
> > the name "gpg-interface: Multiple signing tools" in april 2018 [1]. After
> > that series was not merged i decided to get my patches ready. The
> > original series aimed at being generic for any sort of signing tool, while
> > this series just introduced the X509 variant of gpg. (gpgsm)
> > I collected authors and reviewers of that first series and already put them
> > on cc.
> 
> This series is a fine replacement for that earlier work. It's flexible
> enough to allow what we really wanted out of that series (gpgsm support,
> or another drop-in tool that uses the same interface). It doesn't lay
> any groundwork for further tools (like signify), but I think the
> consensus on the list was to punt on that until somebody had more
> concrete plans for adding such a tool.

I actually think this moves in a nice direction for adding support for
minisign/signify and other schemes.  There's a way to look up what
algorithm is in use in a particular context based on the first line and
a general interface for deciding what format to write.  Granted, it
currently still is very specific to gpg-style tools, but I think this is
an improvement in that regard.

As an OpenPGP user, I have no interest in adding support for other
tools, but I think this should make it easier if someone else wants to
do that.
-- 
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 867 bytes --]