From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84BF51F403 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2018 21:03:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751183AbeFCVDs (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jun 2018 17:03:48 -0400 Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:58994 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751123AbeFCVDr (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Jun 2018 17:03:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=thunk.org; s=ef5046eb; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=3/VNW5xq2gFQpQSaA+psPa7IwAVICTtW+qIcZ8qLwRI=; b=ozGSm1SwQe/43sl/UsQqlhFaLM w9GEwbnZoXf6QHPY2WLePX4Bnz/xmYTUzQGJeKa2HKtcYx0gauA+vlvC1sM5bZgoSmp1KUZcSEVLp 83FoI1YbCgV+YOvlBs9OyYvy2aCMAspYYx3Fen+fB1L3Xu0HHAWoJPUoxpC5Wm+FlNPs=; Received: from root (helo=callcc.thunk.org) by imap.thunk.org with local-esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fPaAD-0006FB-9C; Sun, 03 Jun 2018 21:03:45 +0000 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 3AF277A60A6; Sun, 3 Jun 2018 17:03:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2018 17:03:44 -0400 From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: Peter Backes Cc: Philip Oakley , =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C6var_Arnfj=F6r=F0?= Bjarmason , Git Mailing List Subject: Re: GDPR compliance best practices? Message-ID: <20180603210344.GF1750@thunk.org> References: <20180603112557.GA6564@helen.PLASMA.Xg8.DE> <87tvqk81qp.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <20180603141801.GA8898@helen.PLASMA.Xg8.DE> <6BE308009FFA4CCDB5B3B47C2AC53E20@PhilipOakley> <20180603174617.GA10900@helen.PLASMA.Xg8.DE> <20180603181807.GB1750@thunk.org> <20180603191107.GA12182@helen.PLASMA.Xg8.DE> <20180603192417.GA12416@helen.PLASMA.Xg8.DE> <20180603200739.GC1750@thunk.org> <20180603205233.GA13451@helen.PLASMA.Xg8.DE> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180603205233.GA13451@helen.PLASMA.Xg8.DE> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 10:52:33PM +02h00, hPeter Backes wrote: > But I will take your message as saying you at least don't see any > obvious criticism leading to complete rejection of the approach. If you don't think a potential 2x -- 10x performance hit isn't a blocking factor --- sure, go ahead and try implementing it. And good luck to you. And this is not a guarantee that it won't get rejected. I certainly don't have the power to make that guarantee. If you don't have time to implement, why do you think it's fair to inflict on everyone else the request for time to do a design review for something for which the need hasn't even been established? Regards, - Ted