From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA8F1F51C for ; Mon, 21 May 2018 23:08:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751073AbeEUXIx (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2018 19:08:53 -0400 Received: from injection.crustytoothpaste.net ([192.241.140.119]:51734 "EHLO injection.crustytoothpaste.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750942AbeEUXIw (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2018 19:08:52 -0400 Received: from genre.crustytoothpaste.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:b978:101:fc4d:8d90:22bd:91d8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by injection.crustytoothpaste.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7906460444; Mon, 21 May 2018 23:08:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=crustytoothpaste.net; s=default; t=1526944131; bh=DYGn+c+CMRuItMPXuleXSVGC0srT6JWCQpF6AzzBou4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Date:To:CC: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:Content-Disposition; b=Y6VyrjIeGvptR1LrGkQgsJRCdnwSaC5t8e1ZFhgjHC6UKYQYbO2beqMroTACDp3sw 5qqXXDiDm+8nxM00EnTLJ8VCHcgeUdgwIXSoR/oSn+rhqhkmDAPV3HQJm2vctRpn0E MKLP7YMhRhVQYh1R43Fvl8NaAuh8vONaU3NoTsYogaZcrpg3T53hxBEneXpS3oEytR L+OBfeUAbKPyga873IjrLan8pdI0V0FTNLCTeRqFmqlZWy4Yn3iSI2ytW/oRRG1HxB yCNfCi7wyh3UhCD+bW3GGlK2J3Q6TM0xDOIoYrJM5zNeOslXntPgQu+YlrAa3JXesU PlNu04PPWPa8j6w78V5BMySF2XiuQoQDFdXhpRQqoXrsnAr4mYbIxoB7y3NEVLk+u9 +4KYmB8xn+oq6+JM2urWGweYnctf4K2DJ9YSzlyxhe9SThyx3lmG06rFf/xKq6FnGl xxdlsQas0cWHT0aCnH0GjJDUADBHw+IA0jpGQy50up4oYBRmZmn Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 23:08:45 +0000 From: "brian m. carlson" To: Ben Peart Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy , Martin =?utf-8?B?w4VncmVu?= , Eric Sunshine , Johannes Sixt , Stefan Beller Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/28] Hash-independent tests Message-ID: <20180521230845.GG652292@genre.crustytoothpaste.net> Mail-Followup-To: "brian m. carlson" , Ben Peart , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy , Martin =?utf-8?B?w4VncmVu?= , Eric Sunshine , Johannes Sixt , Stefan Beller References: <20180516015630.661349-1-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> <20180521020147.648496-1-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> <63adc6e2-19c6-72c9-1c56-47503e128231@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ewQ5hdP4CtoTt3oD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <63adc6e2-19c6-72c9-1c56-47503e128231@gmail.com> X-Machine: Running on genre using GNU/Linux on x86_64 (Linux kernel 4.15.0-3-amd64) User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.5 (2018-04-13) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 127.0.1.1 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org --ewQ5hdP4CtoTt3oD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 09:17:39AM -0400, Ben Peart wrote: > Do you plan to update those tests that hard code the SHA of the index file > itself? For example, t1700-split-index.sh has hard coded values for the = SHA > and currently only supports different hard coded values for V4 indexes vs > others. I have some additional test changes that use the SHA1 prerequisite, plus some that fix issues due to the use of a different hash algorithm or a longer hash algorithm. Ultimately, I plan to discard the SHA1 prerequisite and update those tests to use a translation table to look up the correct values depending on the hash algorithm in use. However, we haven't decided on the actual algorithm that NewHash will be yet, so I can't write those translation tables at this point. I plan to start a discussion about the choice of algorithm soon, since we'll soon need to make a decision in order to progress, but I need to do some research and testing in order to have sufficient facts to present to the list. --=20 brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204 --ewQ5hdP4CtoTt3oD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEX8OngXdrJt+H9ww3v1NdgR9S9osFAlsDUX0ACgkQv1NdgR9S 9oucIRAA0LMf8tledw47YFqFTSqWwYJ/+p1UuRma6p5GdFVcSjW0pcGgaNVhPQ4J 6W8jlBZ67JgGtAQ73V8OqYpqqInzNEDqfeSrAYrO+bAbWVCNBk6qbmYolFVwe34y uYkW8z9tuDjTzuKj71s4aXPtkt9sMTUvZHVLkD2HY1qrD+g2iE0ZB1gJR8qO3cvc O9CKB0zmh+9eJpWQFIevMXi3WDbAXCSUkZyKd0+K2RZYEpPBJ7QBjfnrkhmYuF6B 7uzU/FRs79zb7hQ3dNwLmYU8MfqV7Iv72+lmobhlJl4UE38g9e8n9Ph6JBNj2OeS K4H63kmxWL6fx2mvW4yV+NEaotu8uvfsuv8+BUfGHlDg4+JGoA3ELyHWYgB6kdXl rqx79M65bMDkhr1D1l6IVPZfUDQv9LXNJ9L7XRisOU3XPP1VapXnPQftx/SeE3Cx Cz4Erop1s+vFoVUOfqXZOnqZJxqAW5vUky470E7voghSn5o+LE6sxKhtbIKWMd7i U2k/M2lLmPOjycTTijhKd1bcvHhXlORXbIPo5dT2Tah6rsav2L0WJR2qr1tZia2k s9Fs3l0CjHv9BgLDlULd0YAOOog3tSoCYxDXFzX5cN0cMpBmWjoKZ/lG+RIuG6c4 JmakqLNsNcXFIvM3x6lqSdjNedhFEpji65yM3LoohpUyS+32PTk= =6Qcq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ewQ5hdP4CtoTt3oD--