From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D34DE1F42E for ; Mon, 7 May 2018 06:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750937AbeEGGhQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2018 02:37:16 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:58352 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750732AbeEGGhQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2018 02:37:16 -0400 Received: (qmail 27920 invoked by uid 109); 7 May 2018 06:37:15 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with SMTP; Mon, 07 May 2018 06:37:15 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 23822 invoked by uid 111); 7 May 2018 06:37:19 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) SMTP; Mon, 07 May 2018 02:37:19 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 07 May 2018 02:37:14 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 02:37:14 -0400 From: Jeff King To: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: main url for linking to git source? Message-ID: <20180507063713.GA28961@sigill.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org The git-scm.com site currently links to https://github.com/git/git for the (non-tarball) source code. Somebody raised the question[1] of whether it should point to kernel.org instead. Do people find one interface more or less pleasing than the other? Do we want to prefer kernel.org as more "official" or less commercial? I could see arguments both ways, so I thought I'd take a straw poll of what people on the list think. -Peff [1] https://github.com/git/git-scm.com/pull/1202