git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Derrick Stolee" <dstolee@microsoft.com>,
	"René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>, "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
	"Stefan Beller" <sbeller@google.com>,
	"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
	"Lars Schneider" <larsxschneider@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, "SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] coccinelle: avoid wrong transformation suggestions from commit.cocci
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 11:31:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180430093153.13040-1-szeder.dev@gmail.com> (raw)

The semantic patch 'contrib/coccinelle/commit.cocci' added in
2e27bd7731 (treewide: replace maybe_tree with accessor methods,
2018-04-06) is supposed to "ensure that all references to the
'maybe_tree' member of struct commit are either mutations or accesses
through get_commit_tree()".  So get_commit_tree() clearly must be able
to directly access the 'maybe_tree' member, and 'commit.cocci' has a
bit of a roundabout workaround to ensure that get_commit_tree()'s
direct access in its return statement is not transformed: after all
references to 'maybe_tree' have been transformed to a call to
get_commit_tree(), including the reference in get_commit_tree()
itself, the last rule transforms back a 'return get_commit_tree()'
statement, back then found only in get_commit_tree() itself, to a
direct access.

Unfortunately, already the very next commit shows that this workaround
is insufficient: 7b8a21dba1 (commit-graph: lazy-load trees for
commits, 2018-04-06) extends get_commit_tree() with a condition
directly accessing the 'maybe_tree' member, and Coccinelle with
'commit.cocci' promptly detects it and suggests a transformation to
avoid it.  This transformation is clearly wrong, because calling
get_commit_tree() to access 'maybe_tree' _in_ get_commit_tree() would
obviously lead to recursion.  Furthermore, the same commit added
another, more specialized getter function get_commit_tree_in_graph(),
whose legitimate direct access to 'maybe_tree' triggers a similar
wrong transformation suggestion.

Exclude both of these getter functions from the general rule in
'commit.cocci' that matches their direct accesses to 'maybe_tree'.
Also exclude load_tree_for_commit(), which, as static helper funcion
of get_commit_tree_in_graph(), has legitimate direct access to
'maybe_tree' as well.

The last rule transforming back 'return get_commit_tree()' statements
to direct accesses thus became unnecessary, remove it.

Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
---
 contrib/coccinelle/commit.cocci | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contrib/coccinelle/commit.cocci b/contrib/coccinelle/commit.cocci
index ac38525941..a7e9215ffc 100644
--- a/contrib/coccinelle/commit.cocci
+++ b/contrib/coccinelle/commit.cocci
@@ -10,11 +10,15 @@ expression c;
 - c->maybe_tree->object.oid.hash
 + get_commit_tree_oid(c)->hash
 
+// These excluded functions must access c->maybe_tree direcly.
 @@
+identifier f !~ "^(get_commit_tree|get_commit_tree_in_graph|load_tree_for_commit)$";
 expression c;
 @@
+  f(...) {...
 - c->maybe_tree
 + get_commit_tree(c)
+  ...}
 
 @@
 expression c;
@@ -22,9 +26,3 @@ expression s;
 @@
 - get_commit_tree(c) = s
 + c->maybe_tree = s
-
-@@
-expression c;
-@@
-- return get_commit_tree(c);
-+ return c->maybe_tree;
-- 
2.17.0.551.g86756ed296


             reply	other threads:[~2018-04-30  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-30  9:31 SZEDER Gábor [this message]
2018-04-30 11:38 ` [PATCH] coccinelle: avoid wrong transformation suggestions from commit.cocci Derrick Stolee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180430093153.13040-1-szeder.dev@gmail.com \
    --to=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=dstolee@microsoft.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=l.s.r@web.de \
    --cc=larsxschneider@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=sbeller@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).