Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] completion: load completion file for external subcommand

["Florian Gamböck" <mail@floga.de>]

On 2018-04-09 07:59, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >  	local completion_func="_git_${command//-/_}"
> > +	if ! declare -f $completion_func >/dev/null 2>/dev/null; then
> > +		declare -f __load_completion >/dev/null 2>/dev/null &&
> > +			__load_completion "git-$command"
> 
> wouldn't the above be easier to read if it were
> 
> 	if ! declare ... $completion_func ... && declare -f __load_completion
> 	then
> 		__load_completion "git-$command"
> 	fi
> 
> or is there a reason why it is better to &&-chain the check for
> __load_completion with its use?  Same comment applies to the other
> hunk.

Good point. I could go even further and ditch the if-construct:

    ! declare -f $completion_func && declare -f __load_completion &&
        __load_completion "git-$command"

I originally intended to do a if-else-construct, which I re-thought
halfway through. I will change that in the next iteration.

Thank you!

-- 
Regards

Florian