From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>, sxlijin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] dir.c: fix off-by-one error in match_pathspec_item
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 15:04:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180405190446.GB21164@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPp-BERWUPCPq-9fVW1LNocqkrfsoF4BPj3gJd9+En43vEkTQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 11:36:45AM -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > Do we care about matching the name "foo" against the patchspec_item "foo/"?
> >
> > That matches now, but wouldn't after your patch.
>
> Technically, the tests pass anyway due to the fallback behavior
> mentioned in the commit message, but this is a really good point. It
> looks like the call to submodule_path_match() from builtin/grep.c is
> going to be passing name without the trailing '/', which is contrary
> to how read_directory_recursive() in dir.c builds up paths (namely
> with the trailing '/'). If we tried to force consistency (either
> always omit the trailing slash or always include it), then we'd
> probably want to do so for match_pathspec() calls as well, and there
> are lots of those throughout the code and auditing it all looks
> painful.
>
> So I should probably make the check handle both cases:
>
> @@ -383,8 +383,9 @@ static int match_pathspec_item(const struct
> pathspec_item *item, int prefix,
> /* Perform checks to see if "name" is a super set of the pathspec */
> if (flags & DO_MATCH_LEADING_PATHSPEC) {
> /* name is a literal prefix of the pathspec */
> + int offset = name[namelen-1] == '/' ? 1 : 0;
> if ((namelen < matchlen) &&
> - (match[namelen] == '/') &&
> + (match[namelen-offset] == '/') &&
> !ps_strncmp(item, match, name, namelen))
> return MATCHED_RECURSIVELY_LEADING_PATHSPEC;
That seems reasonable to me, and your "offset" trick here should prevent
us from getting confused. Can namelen ever be zero here? I guess
probably not (I could see an empty pathspec, but an empty path does not
make sense).
There are other similar trailing-slash matches in that function, but I'm
not sure of all the cases in which they're used. I don't know if any of
those would need similar treatment (sorry for being vague; I expect I'd
need a few hours to dig into how the pathspec code actually works, and I
don't have that today).
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-05 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-05 17:34 [RFC PATCH 0/7] Fix `git clean` with pathspecs Elijah Newren
2018-04-05 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] dir.c: Fix typo in comment Elijah Newren
2018-04-05 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] dir.c: fix off-by-one error in match_pathspec_item Elijah Newren
2018-04-05 17:49 ` Jeff King
2018-04-05 18:36 ` Elijah Newren
2018-04-05 19:04 ` Jeff King [this message]
2018-04-05 20:06 ` Elijah Newren
2018-04-06 17:53 ` Jeff King
2018-04-05 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] t7300: Add some testcases showing failure to clean specified pathspecs Elijah Newren
2018-04-05 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] dir: Directories should be checked for matching pathspecs too Elijah Newren
2018-04-05 18:58 ` Jeff King
2018-04-05 19:15 ` Elijah Newren
2018-04-05 19:31 ` Jeff King
2018-04-09 2:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-04-05 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] dir: Make the DO_MATCH_SUBMODULE code reusable for a non-submodule case Elijah Newren
2018-04-05 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] dir: If our pathspec might match files under a dir, recurse into it Elijah Newren
2018-04-05 17:34 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] If we do not want globs to recurse into subdirs without -d Elijah Newren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180405190446.GB21164@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=sxlijin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).