git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / Atom feed
From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
To: Andreas Heiduk <asheiduk@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] git-svn: allow empty email-address in authors-prog and authors-file
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 22:07:43 +0000
Message-ID: <20180320220743.GA17234@whir> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3fce9b7-9fc7-c5a6-eaa5-a5c12ef7d492@gmail.com>

Andreas Heiduk <asheiduk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Am 19.03.2018 um 00:04 schrieb Eric Wong:
> > Andreas Heiduk <asheiduk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> The email address in --authors-file and --authors-prog can be empty but
> >> git-svn translated it into a syntethic email address in the form
> >> $USERNAME@$REPO_UUID. Now git-svn behaves like git-commit: If the email
> >> is explicitly set to the empty string, the commit does not contain
> >> an email address.
> > 
> > What is missing is WHY "<>" is preferable to "<$USERNAME@$REPO_UUID>".
> >
> > $USERNAME is good anyways since projects/organizations tie their
> > SVN usernames to email usernames via LDAP, making it easy to
> > infer their email address from $USERNAME.  The latter can also
> > be used to disambiguate authors if they happen to have the same
> > real name.
> 
> That's still available and it's even still the default.

OK.

> But: If the user of git-svn takes the burden of writing an authors
> script or maintaining an authors file then he should have full control
> over the result as long as git can handle the output reasonably.
> Currently that's the case for git but not for git-svn.

Fair enough.

>     jondoe <>
> 
> just means: "There is intentionally no email address." For an
> internal, ephemeral repository that can be OK. It has the advantage,
> that no automatic system (Jira, Jenkins, ...) will try to send emails to 
> 
>     jondoe <jondoe@6aafaa21e0fb4338a68ab372a049893d>

OK, that's a good reason to allow "<>" and should be in the
commit message.

> Further steps: Eric Sunshine mentioned [1] that you might have concerns about
> the change of behavior per se. For me the patch is not so much a new feature but
> a bugfix bringing git-svn in sync with git itself. Adding an option parameter 
> to enable the new behavior seems strange to me. But there might be other ways
> to achieve the same effect:

New options are not desirable, either, as they increase
testing/maintenance overhead.  So I'm inclined to take your
patch with only an updated commit message...

No rush, though; will wait another bit for others to comment and
I expect to be preoccupied this week with other projects and
weather problems on the forecast :<

  reply index

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20180304112237.19254-1-asheiduk@gmail.co>
2018-03-11 13:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] git-svn: --author-prog improvements Andreas Heiduk
2018-03-18 21:19   ` Andreas Heiduk
2018-03-18 21:31     ` Eric Sunshine
2018-03-11 13:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] git-svn: search --authors-prog in PATH too Andreas Heiduk
2018-03-11 13:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] git-svn: allow empty email-address in authors-prog and authors-file Andreas Heiduk
2018-03-18 23:04   ` Eric Wong
2018-03-19 22:48     ` Andreas Heiduk
2018-03-20 22:07       ` Eric Wong [this message]
2018-03-24 10:20         ` [PATCH v3] git-svn: allow empty email-address using " Andreas Heiduk
2018-04-05  7:51           ` Eric Wong
2018-04-05 18:23             ` Andreas Heiduk
2018-04-05 19:44               ` Eric Wong
2018-04-11 23:18                 ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180320220743.GA17234@whir \
    --to=e@80x24.org \
    --cc=asheiduk@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://public-inbox.org/git
	git clone --mirror http://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/git

Newsgroups are available over NNTP:
	nntp://news.public-inbox.org/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git

 note: .onion URLs require Tor: https://www.torproject.org/
       or Tor2web: https://www.tor2web.org/

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox