git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / Atom feed
From: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Somebody <somebody@ex.com>, Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/5] merge-recursive: fix rename/add conflict handling
Date: Mon,  5 Mar 2018 09:11:23 -0800
Message-ID: <20180305171125.22331-4-newren@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180305171125.22331-1-newren@gmail.com>

This makes the rename/add conflict handling make use of the new
handle_file_collision() function, which fixes several bugs and improves
things for the rename/add case significantly.  Previously, rename/add
would:

  * Not leave any higher order stage entries in the index, making it
    appear as if there were no conflict.
  * Would place the rename file at the colliding path, and move the
    added file elsewhere, which combined with the lack of higher order
    stage entries felt really odd.  It's not clear to me why the
    rename should take precedence over the add; if one should be moved
    out of the way, they both probably should.
  * In the recursive case, it would do a two way merge of the added
    file and the version of the renamed file on the renamed side,
    completely excluding modifications to the renamed file on the
    unrenamed side of history.

Using the new handle_file_collision() fixes all of these issues, and
adds smarts to allow two-way merge OR move colliding files to separate
paths depending on the similarity of the colliding files.

Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
---
 merge-recursive.c                 | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh |  19 +++---
 2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c
index c54b918dc8..403c0006dc 100644
--- a/merge-recursive.c
+++ b/merge-recursive.c
@@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ static int oid_eq(const struct object_id *a, const struct object_id *b)
 enum rename_type {
 	RENAME_NORMAL = 0,
 	RENAME_DIR,
+	RENAME_ADD,
 	RENAME_DELETE,
 	RENAME_ONE_FILE_TO_ONE,
 	RENAME_ONE_FILE_TO_TWO,
@@ -223,6 +224,7 @@ static inline void setup_rename_conflict_info(enum rename_type rename_type,
 					      struct stage_data *src_entry1,
 					      struct stage_data *src_entry2)
 {
+	int ostage1, ostage2;
 	struct rename_conflict_info *ci = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct rename_conflict_info));
 	ci->rename_type = rename_type;
 	ci->pair1 = pair1;
@@ -240,18 +242,22 @@ static inline void setup_rename_conflict_info(enum rename_type rename_type,
 		dst_entry2->rename_conflict_info = ci;
 	}
 
-	if (rename_type == RENAME_TWO_FILES_TO_ONE) {
-		/*
-		 * For each rename, there could have been
-		 * modifications on the side of history where that
-		 * file was not renamed.
-		 */
-		int ostage1 = o->branch1 == branch1 ? 3 : 2;
-		int ostage2 = ostage1 ^ 1;
+	/*
+	 * For each rename, there could have been
+	 * modifications on the side of history where that
+	 * file was not renamed.
+	 */
+	if (rename_type == RENAME_ADD ||
+	    rename_type == RENAME_TWO_FILES_TO_ONE) {
+		ostage1 = o->branch1 == branch1 ? 3 : 2;
 
 		ci->ren1_other.path = pair1->one->path;
 		oidcpy(&ci->ren1_other.oid, &src_entry1->stages[ostage1].oid);
 		ci->ren1_other.mode = src_entry1->stages[ostage1].mode;
+	}
+
+	if (rename_type == RENAME_TWO_FILES_TO_ONE) {
+		ostage2 = ostage1 ^ 1;
 
 		ci->ren2_other.path = pair2->one->path;
 		oidcpy(&ci->ren2_other.oid, &src_entry2->stages[ostage2].oid);
@@ -1119,6 +1125,18 @@ static int merge_file_special_markers(struct merge_options *o,
 	char *side2 = NULL;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (o->branch1 != branch1) {
+		/*
+		 * It's weird getting a reverse merge with HEAD on the bottom
+		 * and the other branch on the top.  Fix that.
+		 */
+		return merge_file_special_markers(o,
+						  one, b, a,
+						  branch2, filename2,
+						  branch1, filename1,
+						  mfi);
+	}
+
 	if (filename1)
 		side1 = xstrfmt("%s:%s", branch1, filename1);
 	if (filename2)
@@ -1290,7 +1308,6 @@ static struct diff_filespec *filespec_from_entry(struct diff_filespec *target,
 	return target;
 }
 
-#if 0 // #if-0-ing avoids unused function warning; will make live in next commit
 static int handle_file_collision(struct merge_options *o,
 				 const char *collide_path,
 				 const char *prev_path1,
@@ -1307,6 +1324,21 @@ static int handle_file_collision(struct merge_options *o,
 	int minimum_score;
 	char *new_path1, *new_path2;
 
+	/*
+	 * It's easiest to get the correct things into stage 2 and 3, and
+	 * to make sure that the content merge puts HEAD before the other
+	 * branch if we just ensure that branch1 == o->branch1.  So, simply
+	 * flip arguments around if we don't have that.
+	 */
+	if (branch1 != o->branch1) {
+		return handle_file_collision(o, collide_path,
+					     prev_path2, prev_path1,
+					     branch2, branch1,
+					     b_oid, b_mode,
+					     a_oid, a_mode,
+					     conflict_markers_already_present);
+	}
+
 	/* Remove rename sources if rename/add or rename/rename(2to1) */
 	if (prev_path1)
 		remove_file(o, 1, prev_path1,
@@ -1412,7 +1444,36 @@ static int handle_file_collision(struct merge_options *o,
 
 	return 0; /* not clean */
 }
-#endif
+
+static int conflict_rename_add(struct merge_options *o,
+			       struct rename_conflict_info *ci)
+{
+	/* a was renamed to c, and a separate c was added. */
+	struct diff_filespec *a = ci->pair1->one;
+	struct diff_filespec *c = ci->pair1->two;
+	char *path = c->path;
+	struct merge_file_info mfi;
+
+	int other_stage = (ci->branch1 == o->branch1 ? 3 : 2);
+
+	output(o, 1, _("CONFLICT (rename/add): "
+	       "Rename %s->%s in %s.  Added %s in %s"),
+	       a->path, c->path, ci->branch1,
+	       c->path, ci->branch2);
+
+	if (merge_file_special_markers(o, a, c, &ci->ren1_other,
+				       o->branch1, path,
+				       o->branch2, ci->ren1_other.path, &mfi))
+		return -1;
+
+	return handle_file_collision(o,
+				     c->path, a->path, NULL,
+				     ci->branch1, ci->branch2,
+				     &mfi.oid, mfi.mode,
+				     &ci->dst_entry1->stages[other_stage].oid,
+				     ci->dst_entry1->stages[other_stage].mode,
+				     !mfi.clean);
+}
 
 static int handle_file(struct merge_options *o,
 			struct diff_filespec *rename,
@@ -2582,36 +2643,23 @@ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *o,
 						      0  /* update_wd    */))
 					clean_merge = -1;
 			} else if (!oid_eq(&dst_other.oid, &null_oid)) {
-				clean_merge = 0;
-				try_merge = 1;
-				output(o, 1, _("CONFLICT (rename/add): Rename %s->%s in %s. "
-				       "%s added in %s"),
-				       ren1_src, ren1_dst, branch1,
-				       ren1_dst, branch2);
-				if (o->call_depth) {
-					struct merge_file_info mfi;
-					if (merge_file_one(o, ren1_dst, &null_oid, 0,
-							   &ren1->pair->two->oid,
-							   ren1->pair->two->mode,
-							   &dst_other.oid,
-							   dst_other.mode,
-							   branch1, branch2, &mfi)) {
-						clean_merge = -1;
-						goto cleanup_and_return;
-					}
-					output(o, 1, _("Adding merged %s"), ren1_dst);
-					if (update_file(o, 0, &mfi.oid,
-							mfi.mode, ren1_dst))
-						clean_merge = -1;
-					try_merge = 0;
-				} else {
-					char *new_path = unique_path(o, ren1_dst, branch2);
-					output(o, 1, _("Adding as %s instead"), new_path);
-					if (update_file(o, 0, &dst_other.oid,
-							dst_other.mode, new_path))
-						clean_merge = -1;
-					free(new_path);
-				}
+				/*
+				 * Probably not a clean merge, but it's
+				 * premature to set clean_merge to 0 here,
+				 * because if the rename merges cleanly and
+				 * the merge exactly matches the newly added
+				 * file, then the merge will be clean.
+				 */
+				setup_rename_conflict_info(RENAME_ADD,
+							   ren1->pair,
+							   NULL,
+							   branch1,
+							   branch2,
+							   ren1->dst_entry,
+							   NULL,
+							   o,
+							   ren1->src_entry,
+							   NULL);
 			} else
 				try_merge = 1;
 
@@ -3004,6 +3052,15 @@ static int process_entry(struct merge_options *o,
 						conflict_info->branch2))
 				clean_merge = -1;
 			break;
+		case RENAME_ADD:
+			/*
+			 * Probably unclean merge, but if the renamed file
+			 * merges cleanly and the result can then be
+			 * two-way merged cleanly with the added file, I
+			 * guess it's a clean merge?
+			 */
+			clean_merge = conflict_rename_add(o, conflict_info);
+			break;
 		case RENAME_DELETE:
 			clean_merge = 0;
 			if (conflict_rename_delete(o,
diff --git a/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh b/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
index 18aa88b5c0..09accbc62a 100755
--- a/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
+++ b/t/t6036-recursive-corner-cases.sh
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup differently handled merges of rename/add conflict' '
 	git branch B &&
 	git checkout -b C &&
 	echo 10 >>a &&
-	echo "other content" >>new_a &&
+	printf "0\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\nfoobar" >new_a &&
 	git add a new_a &&
 	test_tick && git commit -m C &&
 
@@ -179,13 +179,13 @@ test_expect_success 'setup differently handled merges of rename/add conflict' '
 	git checkout B^0 &&
 	test_must_fail git merge C &&
 	git clean -f &&
+	git add new_a &&
 	test_tick && git commit -m D &&
 	git tag D &&
 
 	git checkout C^0 &&
 	test_must_fail git merge B &&
-	rm new_a~HEAD new_a &&
-	printf "Incorrectly merged content" >>new_a &&
+	printf "0\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\nbad merge" >new_a &&
 	git add -u &&
 	test_tick && git commit -m E &&
 	git tag E
@@ -204,15 +204,18 @@ test_expect_success 'git detects differently handled merges conflict' '
 	test $(git rev-parse :2:new_a) = $(git rev-parse D:new_a) &&
 	test $(git rev-parse :3:new_a) = $(git rev-parse E:new_a) &&
 
-	git cat-file -p B:new_a >>merged &&
+	# Since A:a == B:new_a, the three-way merge of A:a, B:new_a, and
+	# C:a is just C:a.  Then we do a two-way merge of that with
+	# C:new_a.
+	git cat-file -p C:a >>merged &&
 	git cat-file -p C:new_a >>merge-me &&
 	>empty &&
 	test_must_fail git merge-file \
-		-L "Temporary merge branch 2" \
-		-L "" \
 		-L "Temporary merge branch 1" \
-		merged empty merge-me &&
-	sed -e "s/^\([<=>]\)/\1\1\1/" merged >merged-internal &&
+		-L "" \
+		-L "Temporary merge branch 2" \
+		merge-me empty merged &&
+	sed -e "s/^\([<=>]\)/\1\1\1/" merge-me >merged-internal &&
 	test $(git rev-parse :1:new_a) = $(git hash-object merged-internal)
 '
 
-- 
2.16.0.41.g6a66043158


  parent reply index

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-05 17:11 [RFC PATCH 0/5] Improve path collision conflict resolutions Elijah Newren
2018-03-05 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] Add testcases for improved file collision conflict handling Elijah Newren
2018-03-08 12:25   ` SZEDER Gábor
2018-03-08 17:51     ` Elijah Newren
2018-03-05 17:11 ` Elijah Newren [this message]
2018-03-05 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] merge-recursive: improve handling for rename/rename(2to1) conflicts Elijah Newren
2018-03-05 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] merge-recursive: improve handling for add/add conflicts Elijah Newren
2018-03-12 18:19 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] Improve path collision conflict resolutions Elijah Newren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180305171125.22331-4-newren@gmail.com \
    --to=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=somebody@ex.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://public-inbox.org/git
	git clone --mirror http://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/git
	git clone --mirror http://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/git

Newsgroups are available over NNTP:
	nntp://news.public-inbox.org/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://ou63pmih66umazou.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://czquwvybam4bgbro.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://hjrcffqmbrq6wope.onion/inbox.comp.version-control.git
	nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git

 note: .onion URLs require Tor: https://www.torproject.org/
       or Tor2web: https://www.tor2web.org/

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox