From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16C520A40 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 18:00:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751858AbdKVSAR (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Nov 2017 13:00:17 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f47.google.com ([209.85.214.47]:37588 "EHLO mail-it0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751794AbdKVSAR (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Nov 2017 13:00:17 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-f47.google.com with SMTP id m191so7354255itg.2 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:00:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ohvhamPWioIQdHCtUdy8wsrWkdpMdu2+JJbbYlHRK18=; b=VS8KNMCvfUBqBDU66r16oiR3Jvt5GgyVQhuqNZvUKvUEf0us+GcU/5Szq1TvTufKwf MMngoaXFvOoLs8iiyjpHJOVf/KRkrF828XaWy4tFcDcIEJmvOySurpZtQV31kBFGbSZM pkAINACKLsFD2hyjUly4r/2AqVuubANJRXoidm/a/UWG/i16vZDwk1Wu9+gAQEfmdUh8 oLJG1MoDRR45RLzFbi6QyiqZt7RO6zqsBrlX6izsk3s59lTN7e8cLdZDk24UyxiqD0oW MS2PBWCNwkz7q2wuuRAUv6Vk0bBaBy/Yo3+Q+T4o64nIT1ELwsArhFDp0n/Vtqvwk40J /B9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ohvhamPWioIQdHCtUdy8wsrWkdpMdu2+JJbbYlHRK18=; b=ONjlH6lk2TyrrGa8DwLpScEPYGJMwZp4q+UXmpF6h5nOX60NhkdQptcNvcdFc2tBen 9c+6N3/oLXiUt4GFrO5UgSf0QpI18RALzZQWJFVL14WFKXenq+qjbmQ25dbu2MXWkxQL XzKK9JePZu3aNp/ZbNeah3AFGBd54vkCBO/jyX8F1v9DHaW0UYoCH0orXBqQKQTAxTKj jWHNUvNVlXvVhNwZwOK5wyrTCulUTzcJqYPDoTyW00qSU9XByh4z5cDnnOTtJJYLZA+F MUn7kJ2Tlr9PCWlJIamRCpH1YVnVvo6WtocxehBi8fWzSZUg5+fEeU+2Ki59OcHiV4TZ xntg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6ac1g1w93zrnpq4xuBlbOj1/AlvMsEu9fGJ+hateg993vaYBaT Odwml2i1kJOZrVBt62kr5XtrXg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZ9dRSy+7TCQoNIntRZ9cIA1CmoH5dHPYDCpkkQUMKtkyir/GJp1JLqBHYs133bPE0Ar1pdZw== X-Received: by 10.36.245.133 with SMTP id k127mr7956350ith.136.1511373616285; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:00:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from twelve3.mtv.corp.google.com ([2620:0:100e:422:4fa:d4be:6ce:3f8b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e203sm2238164itb.32.2017.11.22.10.00.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:00:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:00:14 -0800 From: Jonathan Tan To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Jeff Hostetler , git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net, Jeff Hostetler Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Partial clone part 2: fsck and promisors Message-Id: <20171122100014.937f5902c3714e6e26e20a1b@google.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20171121210720.21376-1-git@jeffhostetler.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 14:25:13 +0900 Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff Hostetler writes: > > > From: Jeff Hostetler > > > > This is V5 of part 2 of partial clone. This assumes V5 of part 1 > > is already present. V5 includes minor cleanup over V4 and better > > separates the --exclude-promisor-objects and --missing arguments. > > > > Part 2 is concerned with fsck, gc, initial support for dynamic > > object fetching, and tracking promisor objects. Jonathan Tan > > originally developed this code. I have moved it on top of > > part 1 and updated it slightly. > > Thanks, will replace/queue all three series. I am getting a feeling > that the first one is already ready for 'next', while the other two > may want to see a bit more comments? Yes, I think so too. Jeff Hostetler and I noticed some issues occuring when some other Git commands dynamically fetch objects due to the fact that those commands and fetch-pack use overlapping object flags. At the very least, we should look at that before it goes into next.