From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817D72036D for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 22:47:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751353AbdKUWrN (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Nov 2017 17:47:13 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f66.google.com ([209.85.214.66]:36258 "EHLO mail-it0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751263AbdKUWrM (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Nov 2017 17:47:12 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-f66.google.com with SMTP id 187so4046125iti.1 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 14:47:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=0fz3PIsVEtwo4JzSXY6NoPiabEAGt9dbvQj1HamqIJ8=; b=pPECQ8qC3Hhu8HBZeqLeCp0M/J4JhcZ8+4VpjOLLA1noSYDMFFVBdPqUzSLXJupQTo ws1W//T+jq+wMuVxe2gIGyInQb8T8D/FErgZpNjoTHDZMo3kv9rXDAKS01gPsh2qv66Y BvIYTyLXzl5Ohx6lepHoWZsdCnbdK2vFsUW8ljTrH1ACRfgpA8JGeO/ekayswqqStrpm rDZeg28jo/vs17O4h5K+hDMLzGgIUfMOxv0DubRibPNhPdkdifovU/y76kCtnfGV7nZ/ MDsSPt7D+z9+djE5eNRPBBR76f7Y8bDWJJzii1aZ2Rnxa5qVsMvNip2y2XXpLLPaeNNv r2LA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=0fz3PIsVEtwo4JzSXY6NoPiabEAGt9dbvQj1HamqIJ8=; b=uJccBZC2D3pDWFzsGRZ7h2uzEu6cICVCbEc1wCosEh1mDvG+qOK4iKeL1NXNGUFWSx PxSSmGATaXDqCXk/QTr1HFaOnZ5ASbhTcE5QaSqo6v3nlHzKmDR9zl62FQZvsIgpoMes B32S5k4gNJld3o4azRoO4IPRazIoZzJ7MxldQgXKvxGDkqj+iuSJF3Y6vKuwyUaNEfBw pC2MZyzpJYIyP7Wk9P7NqA81vlhNp3he5ySqH0dFnI+tqd/sr8Be2nlRCYJ1p8iMJ8Ce GVxPYzH6SO98rLAmWV2iW1yYL4CkdaauwEdwu0+6ucn40rOHeBdw//a6Bp4OWjZMZbIV fbOg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5tzwSu/pae0TEwI4F5HIB8QpUpcIEQKu0kVxDAnwviGUbVmydq 85H+YWCfalQ97SKpceXhJd0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMasVfu+V6vgA5BiukuhzSdkKrRYVh6gUUYQmm7zFmC3+2ngSxdDo+fKiw3umZPQYXvLjaMcmA== X-Received: by 10.36.37.138 with SMTP id g132mr4420824itg.72.1511304431785; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 14:47:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from aiede.mtv.corp.google.com ([2620:0:100e:422:4187:1d6c:d3d6:9ce6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o1sm1188170ite.2.2017.11.21.14.47.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 21 Nov 2017 14:47:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 14:47:09 -0800 From: Jonathan Nieder To: Stefan Beller Cc: Junio C Hamano , "git@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] recursive submodules: detach HEAD from new state Message-ID: <20171121224709.GJ3429@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com> References: <20170724173601.19921-1-sbeller@google.com> <20170724180312.GE13924@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com> <20171121223449.GI3429@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi, Stefan Beller wrote: > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Stefan, do you know what thread I should look at to find the current >> state of this patch? I've had it applied locally for a long time. > > It was "Undecided" for some time, then Junio kicked it back to pu, expecting a > reroll[1]. The "send out a plan" that was referenced is found in [2] > describing 6 plans for the future of submodules. The approach in [3] > which is different on the implementation level, but very similar on > the UX level sounds best currently. I'll coordinate with JTan to > come up with patches for that. > > [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/CAGZ79kYUZv0g+3OEMrbT26A7mSLJzeS-yf5Knr-CnARHqVB=aQ@mail.gmail.com/ > [2] https://public-inbox.org/git/20171109001007.11894-1-sbeller@google.com/ > [3] https://public-inbox.org/git/20171108172945.33c42a0e91b4ac494217b788@google.com/ Thanks. That thread appears to be about a long-term plan; what is the short-term plan? E.g. is there any additional documentation that should be added to the patch that detaches? Or should it go in as-is? Thanks, Jonathan