From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3DD2021B for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 23:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753219AbdKMXFC (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 18:05:02 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-f169.google.com ([209.85.128.169]:54455 "EHLO mail-wr0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752635AbdKMXFB (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 18:05:01 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-f169.google.com with SMTP id l22so15861226wrc.11 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:05:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nyu-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=zJWDNZzgLtJhQyZ/abd/hQXsu8WQtl6AYUPmS3XEMhU=; b=uUiUfL/x9oS1/VjrbVfX1GjTdw0HuW5HSigUE/9gO2jk+2wslo9FEdQryKaHBgksz2 DwjwK1DQteeG3QKDWZlEg2QHHaxwcfBC2t7gzlqINVFih4uJor5KHn925bx8sJoFUJOY FJHnlLoNieBsOfdWJPSmLP54XUKacBOAWSOA8fIPpnmKc7msnRSFj6ymQx/UQSiVTHXa wmOS9dcwoVy6tzdvT+SAAIdP0hsixW5lF1n2T2b/zAoOoLBLgYw/YlLUV+QXVvKjlqaV qB+Q79a2NJAOXvxjVhfWIREhrEpim4tETcZAZWPKkfNJR70dbQu3CV3RLJZALSRaQuMG TLPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=zJWDNZzgLtJhQyZ/abd/hQXsu8WQtl6AYUPmS3XEMhU=; b=HvUEX9bOEKMqyVcik++5GSJ8ioXYzdS239hP0odTP+mM3JHIFBrw6S+wIee+9J8Xo9 CK7dDNGqlWmycTR08/5cVkn4uC6dd8FbEi29HVpizVZ/qTI0RQlzO4ZUgkjGiX4LWMOL aJcfNFMsuX28qzWoc3grBGjyfYYyzbpeHGPczdSaNRSASJIhU5bWDgl+85L4PmtnTFu+ Siy7M3uUq0UKtdAfxUqL3j977AxRd3/1QCoc6VprnImLYccmeJn4D2uXjxpWVb1sE206 gSBtFyD7j1yPRUbrCqHzk1ZtSqnw/KDCjf1p9bFWjEvR4JY+iOx6O2AutHkTeLaNSiYe d9Tg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX78V1qdSx5mmlyh4pL56W9w9mMQQFIC1bTqU7SdkmIYU4p+xpgt iiWIdcQ7L3ryBLl3PJd3Pk7gow== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaJgVl+QMab9kBOLi09kDBDIXDjrTFwQJN1spTYau1qxnhakt1SEf3qdO4o2sQUKM3i+bsfhg== X-Received: by 10.223.164.22 with SMTP id d22mr9402617wra.232.1510614300143; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:05:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from LykOS.localdomain (cpe-67-245-44-149.nyc.res.rr.com. [67.245.44.149]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 195sm31316562wmj.3.2017.11.13.15.04.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:04:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 18:06:13 -0500 From: Santiago Torres To: Todd Zullinger Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] t/lib-gpg: fix gpgconf stderr redirect to /dev/null Message-ID: <20171113230612.nyygui2ahuqzrjsr@LykOS.localdomain> References: <20171113210745.24638-1-tmz@pobox.com> <20171113221823.jzt7jfhxeuyivbcn@LykOS.localdomain> <20171113224323.GR5144@zaya.teonanacatl.net> <20171113230201.3gyqh2oknic2o6mg@LykOS.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5p7tpbgq3bsqnalu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171113230201.3gyqh2oknic2o6mg@LykOS.localdomain> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org --5p7tpbgq3bsqnalu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quick followup. The version that triggers this is at least 2.1.21[1]. I recall there was so= me wiggle room on minor versions before it. Thanks! -Santiago. [1] https://dev.gnupg.org/T3218 On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 06:02:02PM -0500, Santiago Torres wrote: > =20 > > Were the ENOENT errors you encountered in running the tests multiple ti= mes > > easy to reproduce?=20 >=20 > If you had the right gpg2, it should be easy to repro with just re-runnin= g. >=20 > > If so, I can certainly try to reproduce them and then > > run the tests with --reload in place of --kill to gpgconf. If that wor= ked > > across the various gnupg 2.x releases, it would be a simple enough chan= ge to > > make as a follow-up. >=20 > Let me dig up the exact versions. IIRC it was somewhere between 2.1.0 and= 2.2.x > or so. I think somewhere within the patch re-rolls I had the exact versio= ns. >=20 > Cheers! > -Santiago. --5p7tpbgq3bsqnalu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEkDurc2QOttZVM+/zRo8SLOgWIpUFAloKJWQACgkQRo8SLOgW IpXNJhAAm7ByBjbCD4KnGhzLFZdhdNWoNjKROJzfGlJQg07OgBYpmb5go8N7BG4J UwyHAHW8WA666oKVt6wcWlNthNe2WmwoU7Gc8nEPg4B08IcaUwI9Q7qboxZCcDy5 Z1bqrYGW1li9hq71vWovMKyxqGqNV2gtUBBXd/kcx4bB/8V0t7AXT6rucwt+isxT YRRarQcSlJ0XOF8lcdnD+NWcfzfQw71rDoxYmoamqcJjIzOLSYU0CTBNhlguf2z/ DG9ZaFidWGrylBCN7UGUd54TbdCwZCgmsZulFh9YDGsp2No+OAAtyuGC7ZZAyaAQ NQO26mRxAgBPT3GSmuJ/0lxz42Q5izSgGGTWgueSjm1rQd6l1w9KALxkEKHPMt3v 5RKYJqhPmP9fOH6o8pU32pUefM2Hfgm8o+47i6dFcLzbCD1jk9fmGxwFIdQq5+v8 1NvH/eBsbmRXB9e5FZYKTDukGv0JfghbYjaXW+ADhlVjXuSfcqAK3StauRh/bs1a X+77kdytklJKAwbk9WTPAximIgMTzB35azCQRphUiTu9geDDkKxMbDMlknKl5W4q Az/D1V5/vJdeIo3AshD7QTm48NBhkzwSBr0nkIQNPNFBrne7YbugI7Nt4x8z1w5f up7C3xPhcRwrFC2RVInrolco9hSOe1xgmjbVCDEiZcRr52NZrNY= =bNZ4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5p7tpbgq3bsqnalu--