From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8201F42B for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 23:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753061AbdKMXAv (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 18:00:51 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:56565 "EHLO mail-wm0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752868AbdKMXAu (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 18:00:50 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id z3so18443130wme.5 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:00:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nyu-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=rgDxS/tDguqtHa29ymyhCTOh8Fa2AMH8F4a1AcFwI04=; b=ESXdkjOOGteuVMhT2ZSCv3Kwdtr12qY4UkCQ9OOdcAAYo1W9P7S8rAyGsd+3VzpW42 jpyRTbiGOIO9hkM/ITH7d1KF4ikDOxOXscQobfD5HU4wyVkrwlTionXJE8GFTkH/8MLX Uy8tC7Zo5Ky9EfUq8gwHugwv5wFDRW08p+mBQtWocdDPssNJKqrNXjCfIZT5nnppMdXP DTylBCYWUSkDaHL3E7Y4MmmCG5x8E/QwHSsTxyX0iBJA+whqEs7/0oPSLXFqqV8eqy1Z lGE5+eGPyrw0Kq62y9rxyUmTASoJzFovKozUnT/sctchufCAbzGM0TEZEIVrIBiH/IK7 XhXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=rgDxS/tDguqtHa29ymyhCTOh8Fa2AMH8F4a1AcFwI04=; b=U7PMx5EHt9EOBUNlhkXc01zoaFwAByIYlynoUC++mzrwOEAeeTx7gAC8ha0i22P0tu QVGblR9bUvXY9upPTiOrBeBnB8WfO50YUVxkkZyiwBJRR7sowDzmUbWOa3blaAJVNi4S j2HZKHU0OIQx+G/gu5mgrY2q9Ty/5oNFfOWUzlFxDA+HDMnumb9MC7d5ELWy3QCu2uZD WOEwzcU6rXQ/Lb+MWpuwcycVFSJJWSdcV6fPrFGkFQpyGtsNUAVvaXAeDOR5jo0e6xZl kCuiiRtF15P8J7CC/L889I3EmUvcmZVwGmXxWB1WSfnky0SC63AY2FFyqG7UFEH5shkL M5pw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4XOCTjGeuKFTw7UiD++DOsOB/6Zogs8mRNtgZLHOwdAh+HcjDN b5pXwgNfvT4AzwMjAgXNVGdhtw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbyfPTy9J3MHIRosGG0euC41im7eAmfaICXv5E/ZZlt1JJ2v0tcDqyNNEhrUk+U1zjVKHklng== X-Received: by 10.28.56.198 with SMTP id f189mr8095027wma.16.1510614048909; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:00:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from LykOS.localdomain (cpe-67-245-44-149.nyc.res.rr.com. [67.245.44.149]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t135sm4319827wmt.24.2017.11.13.15.00.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:00:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 18:02:02 -0500 From: Santiago Torres To: Todd Zullinger Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] t/lib-gpg: fix gpgconf stderr redirect to /dev/null Message-ID: <20171113230201.3gyqh2oknic2o6mg@LykOS.localdomain> References: <20171113210745.24638-1-tmz@pobox.com> <20171113221823.jzt7jfhxeuyivbcn@LykOS.localdomain> <20171113224323.GR5144@zaya.teonanacatl.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a5ynz3zyftqshzhg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171113224323.GR5144@zaya.teonanacatl.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org --a5ynz3zyftqshzhg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 > Were the ENOENT errors you encountered in running the tests multiple times > easy to reproduce?=20 If you had the right gpg2, it should be easy to repro with just re-running. > If so, I can certainly try to reproduce them and then > run the tests with --reload in place of --kill to gpgconf. If that worked > across the various gnupg 2.x releases, it would be a simple enough change= to > make as a follow-up. Let me dig up the exact versions. IIRC it was somewhere between 2.1.0 and 2= =2E2.x or so. I think somewhere within the patch re-rolls I had the exact versions. Cheers! -Santiago. --a5ynz3zyftqshzhg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEkDurc2QOttZVM+/zRo8SLOgWIpUFAloKJGQACgkQRo8SLOgW IpVglg/+Ng89dRA76ftgv+kBByM3L6UIHOo5eBE+atUtAfs+K4obPSiJjcSkYV/0 y0EXnKiJ9U8uh9GRA0eZpaAnzQ0hdL9AZHvwrV2EM24l9Qr+Dkj4zAC8uqBx297W 70L2AwBELYbcHmngPJUI/2Ucu3jKh7zes6hgPjw1HIfY0wZ0QcoN8ap1/9hru4PR jJ4poqsMzEX0ZrBgqrtqr2Il45SXi2kWxFPZnMHIjgQaTMlN64/faoFUw+aPmMo+ MuIc5SUeg6nHN9HimeK5v4jccbSty/XM1NdVeMxrVBBKplGEPYlNq8rZIj2dvriX JFrq6x7m2mTaR3/co+RNYjrXUN4dDqeFNl1cN4dcUrdFTNKCLjn41LMsskKo9ZlL bEDRFn3mVClvHn/GAynL8lm746dgl9yosiHbBWXkLzSmPEBZX0KdTQKYDkmknH6N fOKSy3x74JP/dkkgZPNBhMiLodJQTdGxTJIKKy6sCPSdJX3cyCKCN4+zIOib+zX1 1lN25QhKeKFtUA+RetosaOXH/dx1JyNz5PikEYhIO7bYjIkVSBUmr99aNQ/2/CPe dPL3eZ2PTyeZjAx2knACVHMcjmqzEhWpCPmOxMctK7kkRfKixoc2PVXoLWJm0nB0 sVGX9a1nBd4wsLZo5vYZk7x4O7xSQeoejF1tN9O++dEBRMmziAs= =dSWi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a5ynz3zyftqshzhg--