From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7667B1F42B for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 22:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752591AbdKMWn2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:43:28 -0500 Received: from mail-qk0-f181.google.com ([209.85.220.181]:50791 "EHLO mail-qk0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752444AbdKMWn1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:43:27 -0500 Received: by mail-qk0-f181.google.com with SMTP id p7so21828129qkd.7 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:43:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=0u6VjKEdrbvhIOxvqkE/O/jtF39CHVaxEV4RnC1xk+o=; b=uqPHnWxTjdmQgp/2kcGbalVdQfOmHdjwtMWaxOGlvh20ZAVNz6lc7xnzpgJDBQH9BD CAFP2c3t0B0KBxbOb0OEwsex18J23xT45IEJvJasSOd08Kp4wXKGyayrL4/4bg8FobuZ C9UgHefeJdRtknVkAkGenAETTxVYNv/AZ069vKRFZ+L4FOZfRqCSD0ZPwlnPtAoCq8uT quQkpo2p+S1KDK7UO7LneN0u34NWY+juK08DR+4QPvMuWT8wCzVGONB+Vnq90FmxfKLd 0wDit5LWVeqV87QIACcY1dziS1IEP7ysq7SaLvl3c45jTic/BoKTemLZ8/2sIsFiXJPX xp6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=0u6VjKEdrbvhIOxvqkE/O/jtF39CHVaxEV4RnC1xk+o=; b=i9D/B+EIT353J9s+aUknsDREglubt/UUhW5zGrfAY1y9ZB5cewkhtFPDAeQ8WhQQBB kJpljKxom4Orp5uDUKn7Exrw6EbGbxEoeTgUNPhnqsHaITv7pVnPxnQW8jrzFDhE01Bp +l/WW07iuNHvY5bnz4zvqn/uDni6DRwsjGjsS6BVyeEqWQALqGbTiZRmcKnHdPQn61pX QDdWwXBTS4vTkRRnXOFfTHyp1xihmrMhyW6K8hdb5QiQdn+Tm56oGh1ivqutODeIZzIi KEwm6MxraQow73SAOWyWmv3Tikpyt/Ju9LXhNJpZ4GvftQWeN/AEkJw12W/BEWQVnuFM mULQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5Rnu6WwplH4o+dNAZI/jzQUem17lqt3k8uBohlv2noKvnAxNEB IKzox7ariXYvQpfymgbLzC0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYsXS0Ue3BEUxk5zmznYheSTb6GpDfTIQ6pCOWaIK7Gn7hlv+Ep/f3pHOUOlgEjRROkphbtMA== X-Received: by 10.55.137.198 with SMTP id l189mr17059485qkd.169.1510613006382; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:43:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from zaya.teonanacatl.net (pool-173-67-181-41.hrbgpa.fios.verizon.net. [173.67.181.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n145sm9508944qke.38.2017.11.13.14.43.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:43:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:43:23 -0500 From: Todd Zullinger To: Santiago Torres Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] t/lib-gpg: fix gpgconf stderr redirect to /dev/null Message-ID: <20171113224323.GR5144@zaya.teonanacatl.net> References: <20171113210745.24638-1-tmz@pobox.com> <20171113221823.jzt7jfhxeuyivbcn@LykOS.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Zpx5Rz5PkYgiNBE6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171113221823.jzt7jfhxeuyivbcn@LykOS.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org --Zpx5Rz5PkYgiNBE6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Santiago, Santiago Torres wrote: > Thanks for catching the redirection issue! I agree that the other=20 > fixes feel like overkill. Are you certain that switching to gpgconf=20 > --reload will have the same effect as --kill? (I know that this is=20 > the case for scdaemon only). I am not at all certain whether reload would work to fix the issues=20 you fixed by killing the agent between runs. :) Were the ENOENT errors you encountered in running the tests multiple=20 times easy to reproduce? If so, I can certainly try to reproduce them=20 and then run the tests with --reload in place of --kill to gpgconf. =20 If that worked across the various gnupg 2.x releases, it would be a=20 simple enough change to make as a follow-up. --=20 Todd ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Whatever it is that the government does, sensible Americans would prefer that the government does it to somebody else. This is the idea behind foreign policy. -- P.J. O'Rourke --Zpx5Rz5PkYgiNBE6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iQFEBAEBCAAuBQJaCiALJxhodHRwczovL3d3dy5wb2JveC5jb20vfnRtei9wZ3Av dG16LmFzYwAKCRBDJZOLvq8M4zaVB/4y+ZDrioiJwuon3dbHkUafnfDGFEMyxDYp 0L8/gJAoHLjk6y9fiRa21/kG/cY4T+/I/DdZXAq0iVRCn1edu1P6mQ5hwyrOhQm/ dTty/5c2rj8HtGggLe0hDGmMFu9epTaUsxiNVh2v1/qoTt0dXMLN85/aa9mWmRM0 kekZdFyBx1Np0WUEO45FrF68ARpLde1x8DkSTCC7mDe63jqtt/VBlJM6/t6o32Xd 2jZKldicbmQjW96zk1HKMg7Ewz219zPJoJDQP1NiHtgZELWz1XCT2JQ1ktZyvhLM ZX/psm8VZgmvKagCNmcYa/beq9u2vgC10G2SsqcM9F4vIG8fmwtB =U8qP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Zpx5Rz5PkYgiNBE6--