From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85E8202A2 for ; Sat, 21 Oct 2017 06:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751187AbdJUGUx (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:20:53 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:59748 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751157AbdJUGUx (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:20:53 -0400 Received: (qmail 9891 invoked by uid 109); 21 Oct 2017 06:20:53 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with SMTP; Sat, 21 Oct 2017 06:20:53 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 22661 invoked by uid 111); 21 Oct 2017 06:20:58 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with SMTP; Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:20:58 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:20:51 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 02:20:51 -0400 From: Jeff King To: "Robert P. J. Day" Cc: Thomas Gummerer , Junio C Hamano , Jonathan Nieder , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/1] mention git stash push first in the man page Message-ID: <20171021062050.wp2fdjwmjhwcorln@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20171005200049.GF30301@hank> <20171005201029.4173-1-t.gummerer@gmail.com> <20171017041405.eavuutzgzgs4ppk2@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20171017214515.GG15399@hank> <20171017214708.ixc2hnut2virarzh@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20171019180801.GI15399@hank> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 04:04:10AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > I don't think there's any reason to go slow in marking something as > > > deprecated. It's the part where we follow up and remove or change the > > > feature that must take a while. > > > > Makes sense, let me drop it from the synopsis then. > > what, exactly, is the oft-referred-to issue with how "git stash > save" works that is being addressed with the new syntax of "git stash > push"? "stash save" soaks up all arguments as the stash message, so it's not possible to specify pathspecs. "push" uses "-m " for the stash message, and can accept pathspecs. -Peff