From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] deprecate git stash save? (was: Re: [PATCH 2/3] http-push: fix construction of hex value from path)
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:13:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171017041332.ooybecmonvssko2k@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171005200049.GF30301@hank>
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:00:49PM +0100, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
> Since you were asking :) With the introduction of 'git stash push',
> my hope was always that we could eventually get rid of 'git stash
> save' and only keep one interface around.
>
> As there still many references to it around on the internet, it
> probably requires a bit of a longer deprecation plan. What do you
> think about the following:
>
> - Change docs/man pages to use 'git stash push' everywhere instead of
> 'git stash save'.
> - Mention the deprecation in the release notes and in the man page.
> - Print a warning when 'git stash save' is used.
> - Eventually get rid of it (maybe something for 3.0?)
>
> The steps above would all occur sequentially with a few releases
> between each of them.
That sounds like a pretty good plan.
> A patch for the first step below. I think that even makes sense if we
> don't want to follow through with the deprecation.
Agreed. The patch mostly looks good, except:
> diff --git a/Documentation/user-manual.txt b/Documentation/user-manual.txt
> index b4d88af133..1c4e44892d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/user-manual.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/user-manual.txt
> @@ -1556,7 +1556,7 @@ so on a different branch and then coming back), unstash the
> work-in-progress changes.
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> -$ git stash save "work in progress for foo feature"
> +$ git stash push "work in progress for foo feature"
> ------------------------------------------------
This needs "-m", doesn't it?
>
> This command will save your changes away to the `stash`, and
> diff --git a/git-stash.sh b/git-stash.sh
> index 8b2ce9afda..8ce6929d7f 100755
> --- a/git-stash.sh
> +++ b/git-stash.sh
> @@ -267,11 +267,11 @@ push_stash () {
> # translation of "error: " takes in your language. E.g. in
> # English this is:
> #
> - # $ git stash save --blah-blah 2>&1 | head -n 2
> - # error: unknown option for 'stash save': --blah-blah
> - # To provide a message, use git stash save -- '--blah-blah'
> - eval_gettextln "error: unknown option for 'stash save': \$option
> - To provide a message, use git stash save -- '\$option'"
> + # $ git stash push --blah-blah 2>&1 | head -n 2
> + # error: unknown option for 'stash push': --blah-blah
> + # To provide a message, use git stash push -- '--blah-blah'
> + eval_gettextln "error: unknown option for 'stash push': \$option
> + To provide a message, use git stash push -- '\$option'"
And here, too?
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-17 4:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-05 20:00 [RFC] deprecate git stash save? (was: Re: [PATCH 2/3] http-push: fix construction of hex value from path) Thomas Gummerer
2017-10-05 20:10 ` [PATCH 2/1] mention git stash push first in the man page Thomas Gummerer
2017-10-17 4:14 ` Jeff King
2017-10-17 21:45 ` Thomas Gummerer
2017-10-17 21:47 ` Jeff King
2017-10-19 18:08 ` Thomas Gummerer
2017-10-20 8:04 ` Robert P. J. Day
2017-10-21 6:20 ` Jeff King
2017-10-21 6:43 ` Robert P. J. Day
2017-10-12 0:56 ` [RFC] deprecate git stash save? Junio C Hamano
2017-10-12 11:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-16 18:19 ` Thomas Gummerer
2017-10-17 4:13 ` Jeff King [this message]
2017-10-17 21:47 ` [RFC] deprecate git stash save? (was: Re: [PATCH 2/3] http-push: fix construction of hex value from path) Thomas Gummerer
2017-10-19 18:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] replace git stash save with git stash push in the documentation Thomas Gummerer
2017-10-19 18:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mark git stash push deprecated in the man page Thomas Gummerer
2017-10-21 6:28 ` Jeff King
2017-10-22 16:31 ` Thomas Gummerer
2017-10-22 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] deprecate git stash save Thomas Gummerer
2017-10-22 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] replace git stash save with git stash push in the documentation Thomas Gummerer
2017-10-22 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] mark git stash push deprecated in the man page Thomas Gummerer
2017-10-22 17:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] stash: remove now superfluos help for "stash push" Thomas Gummerer
2017-10-23 0:39 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] deprecate git stash save Jeff King
2017-10-23 1:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-23 5:18 ` Jeff King
2017-10-23 6:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-23 5:47 ` Robert P. J. Day
2017-10-23 1:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-10-21 6:26 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] replace git stash save with git stash push in the documentation Jeff King
2017-10-22 16:28 ` Thomas Gummerer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171017041332.ooybecmonvssko2k@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=t.gummerer@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).