From: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
To: Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>
Cc: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org, sbeller@google.com, gitster@pobox.com,
jonathantanmy@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/7] transitioning to protocol v2
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 14:10:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170829211007.GF131745@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ff0ead4-e13a-220e-f858-36ab206c1485@jeffhostetler.com>
On 08/29, Jeff Hostetler wrote:
>
>
> On 8/25/2017 1:35 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Jeff King wrote:
> >>On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 03:53:21PM -0700, Brandon Williams wrote:
> >
> >>>Another version of Git's wire protocol is a topic that has been discussed and
> >>>attempted by many in the community over the years. The biggest challenge, as
> >>>far as I understand, has been coming up with a transition plan to using the new
> >>>server without breaking existing clients and servers. As such this RFC is
> >>>really only concerned with solidifying a transition plan. Once it has been
> >>>decided how we can transition to a new protocol we can get into decided what
> >>>this new protocol would look like (though it would obviously eliminate the ref
> >>>advertisement ;).
> >>
> >
> >>I don't think libgit2 implements the server side. That leaves probably
> >>JGit, Microsoft's VSTS (which I think is custom), and whatever Atlassian
> >>and GitLab use.
> >
> >I'd be happy if someone tests the patches against those. :)
>
> I just wanted to jump in here and say I've done some initial
> testing of this against VSTS and so far it seems fine. And yes,
> we have a custom git server.
>
> VSTS doesn't support the "git://" protocol, so the double-null trick
> isn't an issue for us. But "https://" worked just fine. I'm still
> asking around internally whether we support passing SSH environment
> variables.
>
> Jeff
>
Thanks for checking on this, I really appreciate it. Please let me know
if anything I haven't thought of becomes an issue.
I'm currently working on getting these patches into a more polished
state to be used (as discussed elsewhere on this thread) as a precursor
to an actual v2.
--
Brandon Williams
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-29 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-24 22:53 [RFC 0/7] transitioning to protocol v2 Brandon Williams
2017-08-24 22:53 ` [RFC 1/7] pkt-line: add packet_write function Brandon Williams
2017-08-24 22:53 ` [RFC 2/7] pkt-line: add strbuf_packet_read Brandon Williams
2017-08-24 22:53 ` [RFC 3/7] protocol: tell server that the client understands v2 Brandon Williams
2017-08-25 17:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-08-25 18:53 ` Brandon Williams
2017-08-25 18:55 ` Brandon Williams
2017-08-24 22:53 ` [RFC 4/7] t: fix ssh tests to cope with using '-o SendEnv=GIT_PROTOCOL' Brandon Williams
2017-08-24 22:53 ` [RFC 5/7] http: send Git-Protocol-Version header Brandon Williams
2017-08-30 10:55 ` Kevin Daudt
2017-08-24 22:53 ` [RFC 6/7] transport: teach client to recognize v2 server response Brandon Williams
2017-08-24 22:53 ` [RFC 7/7] upload-pack: ack version 2 Brandon Williams
2017-09-01 22:02 ` Bryan Turner
2017-09-01 23:20 ` Brandon Williams
2017-08-25 1:19 ` [RFC 0/7] transitioning to protocol v2 Junio C Hamano
2017-08-25 17:07 ` Stefan Beller
2017-08-25 17:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-08-25 17:36 ` Jeff King
2017-08-25 17:29 ` Jeff King
2017-08-25 17:35 ` Jonathan Nieder
2017-08-25 17:41 ` Jeff King
2017-08-25 18:50 ` Brandon Williams
2017-08-29 20:08 ` Jeff Hostetler
2017-08-29 21:10 ` Brandon Williams [this message]
2017-08-30 3:06 ` Jeff King
2017-08-30 13:30 ` Jeff Hostetler
2017-08-30 16:54 ` Brandon Williams
2017-08-25 17:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-08-30 20:38 ` Bryan Turner
2017-08-30 21:12 ` Brandon Williams
2017-09-01 23:06 ` Bryan Turner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170829211007.GF131745@google.com \
--to=bmwill@google.com \
--cc=git@jeffhostetler.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).