From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AD4208CD for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 07:50:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752482AbdHTHuF (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Aug 2017 03:50:05 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:43842 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751055AbdHTHuF (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Aug 2017 03:50:05 -0400 Received: (qmail 21061 invoked by uid 109); 20 Aug 2017 07:50:04 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with SMTP; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 07:50:04 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 12504 invoked by uid 111); 20 Aug 2017 07:50:31 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with SMTP; Sun, 20 Aug 2017 03:50:31 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 20 Aug 2017 03:50:02 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2017 03:50:02 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Kevin Daudt Cc: Junio C Hamano , "Carlsson, Magnus" , "git@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: git fetch with refspec does not include tags? Message-ID: <20170820075001.gmsxeh3fh4f2topg@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1502960406180.9006@arris.com> <1502960572292.1402@arris.com> <20170817092853.hteuzni5lxia4ejf@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20170817202257.GC3839@alpha.vpn.ikke.info> <20170817204312.GD3839@alpha.vpn.ikke.info> <20170820074728.4dawjlnaufjdf4j5@sigill.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170820074728.4dawjlnaufjdf4j5@sigill.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 03:47:28AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > Yeah, I don't think we want to go back to the original behavior. I agree > that it is partially to blame for the inconsistency that started this > thread, but I think on balance it has saved much more confusion than it > has started. And we can address that inconsistency with better tag rules > (like the "autofollow if we wrote any real refs" thing). > > I don't have a patch for that yet, so if anybody feels like taking a > look, it would be much appreciated. Also: I don't think we've seen a patch yet for documenting the current auto-follow behavior. Even if we don't make a behavior change, let's not forget to improve that, which should be much less work. :) -Peff