From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6232202AC for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751271AbdGMRdD (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jul 2017 13:33:03 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:35562 "EHLO mail-pg0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751017AbdGMRdC (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jul 2017 13:33:02 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id j186so32840518pge.2 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 10:33:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=OMyhpTIku+be4HUZMVlvQ5J7dzjzELoMC5nzcYsuN5Q=; b=BAF90mf0TJUK5LKfvzWpclOIS9tUDykXSpK/bjRiTX6hGmADtFdyHdR8qZNcOX8ZoD VioqHJ8rgKsNxswCf17qMAArBRRqqYy9MCtprIgnd8Q1LYx+UpNUFapNLtBoysqk69WX mZRWoZgG+Z6n/4DQcpzPvf3FtA85jEzEJ+vhbZ/iqFnUL28VCYQ8pIJxBAD/O2jT9nSg mSfc6ptDL1Vhz1ckLMOJld47hEwIECU17AE+iUi4vhKgYQmC4dUeYixFfB8ekkScFj5H heU6AVl0It9Fn6ZS4pLrMNHOamM6b++tw/PfMyV1YrkryVQ9ckEUAbm+5Vcvdm+9bG9G bcPQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=OMyhpTIku+be4HUZMVlvQ5J7dzjzELoMC5nzcYsuN5Q=; b=qBdSB063a4aRJps/3t2Z0Uz3PEAtRDx/M1WVp2AAguG7FKG/MbhQMkRscmirWwaUq0 EutcBYoWuLMLPfXhDpMC8yC2jSHyhfTMYkXB0FDwcdYy9i2A4MUUylN/jb9J+RhP3tAV A4NVrjql6FwhUhtEqb+mgfH1u/CROOzePAX3UdfeE0M1VmueGTPflV6WzrPg+qH6zxQ0 l+8Ae6sgGqj/CfCDqUbMR1nkX63cDXWvwVwBBWnI9qfPemqc5yMEUMD0XMX5qeAoiV/a iBpRinz+l6HxwMBr/EFFtiSMwxEeVW2CLJfaYWFMHfHtS+QQ7E+7vevwZQTsI5jQtCtK bIOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113iqFy426soSo5XU4ZDpqVDpYGYGWQcI+GiUEd1tkNMTKScVJeC uLpwnOQPhldpxLGR X-Received: by 10.84.216.21 with SMTP id m21mr11404975pli.294.1499967182195; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 10:33:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2620:0:100e:422:1d60:2aee:c595:bad8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a125sm10707135pgc.37.2017.07.13.10.33.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Jul 2017 10:33:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 10:32:59 -0700 From: Brandon Williams To: Stefan Beller Cc: Jeff King , Junio C Hamano , "git@vger.kernel.org" , Jonathan Tan Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: Introduce '.gitorderfile' Message-ID: <20170713173259.GA30081@google.com> References: <20170711233827.23486-1-sbeller@google.com> <20170712205734.h77fgbbkavwpkr4h@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20170713155923.a2nissoyczvewoh3@sigill.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 07/13, Stefan Beller wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Jeff King wrote: > >> This triggers two reactions for me: > >> > >> (a) We should totally do that. > > > >> (b) It's a rabbit hole to go down. > > > > And yes, I had both of those reactions, too. We've had the > > "project-level .gitconfig" discussion many times over the years. And it > > generally comes back to "you can ship a snippet of config and then give > > people a script which adds it to their repo". > > I see this "project-level .gitconfig" via the .gitmodules file. > See GITMODULES(5), anything except submodule..path is > just project-level .gitconfig, so in that sense we already threw out the > baby with the bathwater. I think we want to be extra careful to not add > more possible options into the .gitmodules file, now that we established > a strong stance on not shipping a project-level .gitconfig. I'm trying to work on cleaning up the submodule-config a bit and as a result I should be able to make it more difficult to ship more project-level configurations in .gitmodules -- Brandon Williams