From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E84201CF for ; Thu, 18 May 2017 21:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754240AbdERVG3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 May 2017 17:06:29 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.83.48]:33313 "EHLO mail-pg0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754048AbdERVG1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 May 2017 17:06:27 -0400 Received: by mail-pg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id u187so28241991pgb.0 for ; Thu, 18 May 2017 14:06:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=vNZfjqwZksgyaRtKMVf9rJrwuxXgE1TyxhmBiM7yCGI=; b=VVp/erwhh5RdejAHXRGLKJNO95sCQw1ke6SzdyX+p2yV/ET7NRmcdtqAbZmZDRU7Gh qGW7TgjVaNLp67Q/Iq5/4yyG0H4Ouv8SN83LX6jArRvRgdUIbnN4PYDPfoNFLMoDfckY OIdiswBBnyqCYvLaXHoTt0U+nPHz0xPkNhZSpzp6OL5o2HhmkQR15lfa4iP5eb361VeZ HiXE8yV8hGPXXFcVMQMCFG8vrLCzVxuB5rEhhvND0SinYHSjeyETAwp4elb74M/lGhcW 7z8MbJ6FO3MqzeuaA9ro3BF/opJ6AKMk4nWDcSXfUaPUEqze6WUWyKnHFYLCoCX3NND6 MRWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=vNZfjqwZksgyaRtKMVf9rJrwuxXgE1TyxhmBiM7yCGI=; b=ml83E2w5V1b92B6rG3qbzxAOWtM2r2KXTR4B0NXyWmSJKjf0EMqUrQixk6S1sf/fST 61wTKf0PDdTrPO/AOi1CArpnW3t4cV8k4HAPms/eidHOfJL05uAou/hDGMsxBS/7voko rDJpqmiGPtINf3FiKPLFxjfUkWPP2+YhntbwvbXLbbLU0QvW18CWqdogta8RFTAIvX8Q 5+VTox9pIaNOuxReCCYTugf6lvtionEANOO0tdcsxJkwMrBdrzNcHbFWIAqgzu4bgJgh h4hzupoR0n7bNfuOPHFr2pO3oswtCYxtDDJC8h/XfBiD3BQY60BBWxIDi3g55Ol9dvql jzcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDyCPOJODBmz+H1AA4pP17DOKkwcLy7TCdwOGp2bsTdoipxZT+n erWN2Xb13q/p9j3U X-Received: by 10.84.142.133 with SMTP id 5mr7236455plx.52.1495141586810; Thu, 18 May 2017 14:06:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com ([2620:0:100e:422:98a0:fe87:dfcc:8fe4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o29sm10832783pgc.27.2017.05.18.14.06.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 18 May 2017 14:06:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 14:06:24 -0700 From: Brandon Williams To: Samuel Lijin Cc: Simon Ruderich , Manish Goregaokar , "git@vger.kernel.org" , Michael Haggerty , Junio C Hamano , Jeff King , =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] refs: Add for_each_worktree_ref for iterating over all worktree HEADs Message-ID: <20170518210624.GF112091@google.com> References: <20170518014210.94189-1-manishearth@gmail.com> <20170518094038.x3xvpsfte3zxpuqd@ruderich.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 05/18, Samuel Lijin wrote: > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:40 AM, Simon Ruderich wrote: > > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 06:45:31PM -0700, Manish Goregaokar wrote: > >> Hm, my invocation of git-send-email keeps getting the threading wrong. > >> Is there a recommended set of arguments to the command? > > > > The threading looks fine here (for both cases where you mentioned > > it being wrong). Why do you think it's wrong? How does it look on > > your end? > > If you're on gmail (as Manish and I both are) patches in a subsequent Gmail does not do threading, well not true threading. It does grouping of emails by subject line, that's it. If you want to view threading (based on message-id) properly then you'll probably need to use a different email client. > version will be threaded (wrongly) against "earlier" versions of the > patch. So if you have patch series A0, A1, A2, A3 and new version B0, > B1, B2, if you thread them as > > A0 > - A1 > - A2 > - A3 > - B0 > - B1 > - B2 > > gmail will show them in your inbox as > > A0 > - B0 > > A1 > - B1 > > A2 > > A3 > - B2 > > Depending on whatever heuristics they use to match up "threads", > presumably because most emails aren't threaded correctly. -- Brandon Williams