From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17FDA2023D for ; Thu, 18 May 2017 09:40:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754756AbdERJkl (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 May 2017 05:40:41 -0400 Received: from zucker.schokokeks.org ([178.63.68.96]:48857 "EHLO zucker.schokokeks.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751548AbdERJkk (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 May 2017 05:40:40 -0400 Received: from localhost ([::1]) (AUTH: PLAIN simon@ruderich.org, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by zucker.schokokeks.org with ESMTPSA; Thu, 18 May 2017 11:40:40 +0200 id 00000000000000AD.00000000591D6C18.000021CA Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 11:40:38 +0200 From: Simon Ruderich To: Manish Goregaokar Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Michael Haggerty , Junio C Hamano , Jeff King , =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] refs: Add for_each_worktree_ref for iterating over all worktree HEADs Message-ID: <20170518094038.x3xvpsfte3zxpuqd@ruderich.org> References: <20170518014210.94189-1-manishearth@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306 (1.8.0) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 06:45:31PM -0700, Manish Goregaokar wrote: > Hm, my invocation of git-send-email keeps getting the threading wrong. > Is there a recommended set of arguments to the command? The threading looks fine here (for both cases where you mentioned it being wrong). Why do you think it's wrong? How does it look on your end? Regards Simon -- + privacy is necessary + using gnupg http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9