From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85DAF1F78F for ; Mon, 1 May 2017 21:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751513AbdEAV1E (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2017 17:27:04 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:43366 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751277AbdEAV1C (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 May 2017 17:27:02 -0400 Received: (qmail 26723 invoked by uid 109); 1 May 2017 21:26:59 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Mon, 01 May 2017 21:26:59 +0000 Received: (qmail 6148 invoked by uid 111); 1 May 2017 21:27:26 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Mon, 01 May 2017 17:27:26 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 01 May 2017 17:26:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 17:26:56 -0400 From: Jeff King To: =?utf-8?B?UmVuw6k=?= Scharfe Cc: Duy Nguyen , Christian Couder , Thomas Gummerer , git , Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] cache-tree: reject entries with null sha1 Message-ID: <20170501212656.h4vhkstjolh46whe@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20170421184617.lc5bioa5px6ninrj@sigill.intra.peff.net> <12c3312c-30a1-2cb1-8f05-63bb663bd0a0@web.de> <20170501192212.xy5o72tinb2hy2a3@sigill.intra.peff.net> <456378ba-a117-8003-eea2-69272ed9bb58@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <456378ba-a117-8003-eea2-69272ed9bb58@web.de> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 11:00:58PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote: > Am 01.05.2017 um 21:22 schrieb Jeff King: > > On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 01:23:28PM +0200, René Scharfe wrote: > > > I can only get gcc and clang to call memcpy instead of inlining it by > > > specifying -fno-builtin. Do you use that option? If yes, why? (Just > > > curious.) > > > > I do my normal edit-compile cycles with -O0 because it's fast, and > > because it makes debugging much easier. > > GCC and Clang still inline memcpy with -O0 alone (at least the versions > I tested). I just checked the assembler output and confirmed that is the case for my builds, even with -O0. Which probably explains why I wasn't able to replicate Duy's valgrind error in the first place. -Peff