From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/12] files-backend: make reflog iterator go through per-worktree reflog
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 11:44:21 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170423044420.GA28419@ash> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d3428e5e-9ac2-0426-31fd-92d29a414b3d@alum.mit.edu>
On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 10:05:02AM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> I find this implementation confusing:
>
> * `if (iter->worktree_dir_iterator)` sounds like it should mean
> that we are iterating over worktree references but it really means
> that we are iterating over the common references in a repository
> that is a linked worktree.
> * `files_reflog_iterator_advance()` is called recursively, but only
> for the first worktree reference.
> * `iter->worktree_dir_iterator` is moved over to `iter->dir_iterator`
> when the common refs are exhausted.
>
> Do you find it more readable as follows?:
It's a bit better, but while we're at it, why not take full advantage
of iterator abstraction?
This replacement patch (with some unrelated bits removed to reduce
distraction) adds a new meta ref-iterator that combine a per-repo and
a per-worktree iterators together. The new iterator walks through both
sub-iterators and drop the per-worktree results from the per-repo
iterator, which will be replaced with results from per-worktree
iterator.
You probably see where I'm going with this. When the new "linked
worktree ref store" comes, it will combine two per-worktree and
per-repo ref stores together and this iterator will come handy.
At that point, files-backend can go back to being oblivious about
$GIT_DIR vs $GIT_COMMON_DIR and files_reflog_iterator_begin() will be
reverted back to the version before this patch.
diff --git a/refs/files-backend.c b/refs/files-backend.c
index 4149943a6e..817b7b5d5e 100644
--- a/refs/files-backend.c
+++ b/refs/files-backend.c
@@ -3432,23 +3423,37 @@ static struct ref_iterator_vtable files_reflog_iterator_vtable = {
files_reflog_iterator_abort
};
-static struct ref_iterator *files_reflog_iterator_begin(struct ref_store *ref_store)
+static struct ref_iterator *reflog_iterator_begin(struct ref_store *ref_store,
+ const char *gitdir)
{
- struct files_ref_store *refs =
- files_downcast(ref_store, REF_STORE_READ,
- "reflog_iterator_begin");
struct files_reflog_iterator *iter = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*iter));
struct ref_iterator *ref_iterator = &iter->base;
struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
base_ref_iterator_init(ref_iterator, &files_reflog_iterator_vtable);
- files_reflog_path(refs, &sb, NULL);
+ strbuf_addf(&sb, "%s/logs", gitdir);
iter->dir_iterator = dir_iterator_begin(sb.buf);
iter->ref_store = ref_store;
strbuf_release(&sb);
+
return ref_iterator;
}
+static struct ref_iterator *files_reflog_iterator_begin(struct ref_store *ref_store)
+{
+ struct files_ref_store *refs =
+ files_downcast(ref_store, REF_STORE_READ,
+ "reflog_iterator_begin");
+
+ if (!strcmp(refs->gitdir, refs->gitcommondir)) {
+ return reflog_iterator_begin(ref_store, refs->gitcommondir);
+ } else {
+ return worktree_ref_iterator_begin(
+ reflog_iterator_begin(ref_store, refs->gitcommondir),
+ reflog_iterator_begin(ref_store, refs->gitdir));
+ }
+}
+
static int ref_update_reject_duplicates(struct string_list *refnames,
struct strbuf *err)
{
diff --git a/refs/iterator.c b/refs/iterator.c
index bce1f192f7..93243a00c4 100644
--- a/refs/iterator.c
+++ b/refs/iterator.c
@@ -40,6 +40,14 @@ void base_ref_iterator_free(struct ref_iterator *iter)
free(iter);
}
+static void ref_iterator_copy_result(struct ref_iterator *dst,
+ const struct ref_iterator *src)
+{
+ dst->refname = src->refname;
+ dst->oid = src->oid;
+ dst->flags = src->flags;
+}
+
struct empty_ref_iterator {
struct ref_iterator base;
};
@@ -382,3 +390,100 @@ int do_for_each_ref_iterator(struct ref_iterator *iter,
return -1;
return retval;
}
+
+struct worktree_ref_iterator {
+ struct ref_iterator base;
+ struct ref_iterator *per_repo_iterator;
+ struct ref_iterator *per_worktree_iterator;
+};
+
+static int worktree_ref_iterator_advance(struct ref_iterator *ref_iterator)
+{
+ struct worktree_ref_iterator *iter =
+ (struct worktree_ref_iterator *)ref_iterator;
+ int ok;
+
+ while (1) {
+ struct ref_iterator **subiter;
+ int normal_only;
+
+ if (iter->per_repo_iterator) {
+ subiter = &iter->per_repo_iterator;
+ /*
+ * If we are in a worktree, then we only
+ * include "normal" common references:
+ */
+ normal_only = !!iter->per_worktree_iterator;
+ } else if (iter->per_worktree_iterator) {
+ subiter = &iter->per_worktree_iterator;
+ normal_only = 0;
+ } else {
+ ok = ITER_DONE;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ ok = ref_iterator_advance(*subiter);
+ if (ok == ITER_ERROR) {
+ *subiter = NULL;
+ break;
+ } else if (ok == ITER_DONE) {
+ *subiter = NULL;
+ /* There might still be worktree refs left: */
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (normal_only &&
+ ref_type((*subiter)->refname) != REF_TYPE_NORMAL)
+ continue;
+
+ ref_iterator_copy_result(&iter->base, *subiter);
+ return ITER_OK;
+ }
+
+ if (ref_iterator_abort(ref_iterator) == ITER_ERROR)
+ return ITER_ERROR;
+
+ return ok;
+}
+
+static int worktree_ref_iterator_peel(struct ref_iterator *ref_iterator,
+ struct object_id *peeled)
+{
+ die("BUG: ref_iterator_peel() called for reflog_iterator");
+}
+
+static int worktree_ref_iterator_abort(struct ref_iterator *ref_iterator)
+{
+ struct worktree_ref_iterator *iter =
+ (struct worktree_ref_iterator *)ref_iterator;
+ int ok = ITER_DONE;
+
+ if (iter->per_repo_iterator)
+ ok = ref_iterator_abort(iter->per_repo_iterator);
+
+ if (iter->per_worktree_iterator) {
+ int ok2 = ref_iterator_abort(iter->per_worktree_iterator);
+ if (ok2 == ITER_ERROR)
+ ok = ok2;
+ }
+
+ base_ref_iterator_free(ref_iterator);
+ return ok;
+}
+
+static struct ref_iterator_vtable worktree_ref_iterator_vtable = {
+ worktree_ref_iterator_advance,
+ worktree_ref_iterator_peel,
+ worktree_ref_iterator_abort
+};
+
+struct ref_iterator *worktree_ref_iterator_begin(struct ref_iterator *per_repo,
+ struct ref_iterator *per_worktree)
+{
+ struct worktree_ref_iterator *iter = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*iter));
+
+ base_ref_iterator_init(&iter->base, &worktree_ref_iterator_vtable);
+ iter->per_repo_iterator = per_repo;
+ iter->per_worktree_iterator = per_worktree;
+ return &iter->base;
+}
diff --git a/refs/refs-internal.h b/refs/refs-internal.h
index 690498698e..dcb1f1d73d 100644
--- a/refs/refs-internal.h
+++ b/refs/refs-internal.h
@@ -387,6 +387,14 @@ struct ref_iterator *prefix_ref_iterator_begin(struct ref_iterator *iter0,
const char *prefix,
int trim);
+/*
+ * Wrap per_repo and per_worktree iterators. Traverse per_repo
+ * iterator, drop per-worktree refs. Then traverse per_worktree
+ * iterator.
+ */
+struct ref_iterator *worktree_ref_iterator_begin(struct ref_iterator *per_repo,
+ struct ref_iterator *per_worktree);
+
/* Internal implementation of reference iteration: */
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-23 4:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-19 11:01 [PATCH v3 00/12] Fix git-gc losing objects in multi worktree Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-04-19 11:01 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] revision.h: new flag in struct rev_info wrt. worktree-related refs Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-04-19 11:01 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] revision.c: refactor add_index_objects_to_pending() Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-04-19 11:01 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] revision.c: --indexed-objects add objects from all worktrees Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-04-19 11:01 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] refs.c: refactor get_submodule_ref_store(), share common free block Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-04-22 5:13 ` Michael Haggerty
2017-04-19 11:01 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] refs: move submodule slash stripping code to get_submodule_ref_store Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-04-19 22:02 ` Johannes Sixt
2017-04-20 2:01 ` Duy Nguyen
2017-04-20 11:56 ` Duy Nguyen
2017-04-20 16:30 ` Johannes Sixt
2017-04-22 5:27 ` Michael Haggerty
2017-04-24 18:12 ` Stefan Beller
2017-04-19 11:01 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] refs: add refs_head_ref() Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-04-22 6:37 ` Michael Haggerty
2017-04-22 8:15 ` Duy Nguyen
2017-04-19 11:01 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] revision.c: use refs_for_each*() instead of for_each_*_submodule() Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-04-19 11:01 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] refs: remove dead for_each_*_submodule() Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-04-19 16:07 ` Ramsay Jones
2017-04-20 3:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-04-22 5:35 ` Michael Haggerty
2017-04-19 11:01 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] revision.c: --all adds HEAD from all worktrees Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-04-22 5:48 ` Michael Haggerty
2017-04-19 11:01 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] files-backend: make reflog iterator go through per-worktree reflog Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-04-22 8:05 ` Michael Haggerty
2017-04-23 4:44 ` Duy Nguyen [this message]
2017-05-17 13:59 ` Michael Haggerty
2017-04-19 11:01 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] revision.c: --reflog add HEAD reflog from all worktrees Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-04-19 11:01 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] rev-list: expose and document --single-worktree Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2017-04-22 8:14 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] Fix git-gc losing objects in multi worktree Michael Haggerty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170423044420.GA28419@ash \
--to=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).