From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487DD207BD for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:35:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S970656AbdDTUfc (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:35:32 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:37206 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S970539AbdDTUfa (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:35:30 -0400 Received: (qmail 32417 invoked by uid 109); 20 Apr 2017 20:35:30 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:35:30 +0000 Received: (qmail 9086 invoked by uid 111); 20 Apr 2017 20:35:54 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:35:54 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:35:28 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:35:28 -0400 From: Jeff King To: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 5/6] docs/bisect-lk2009: update nist report link Message-ID: <20170420203528.ij4tfmz4g4hafwr2@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20170420203203.xlbajdfzy7gp3hj3@sigill.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170420203203.xlbajdfzy7gp3hj3@sigill.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org The original NIST press release linked here is no longer available. But it was just a one-page summary of a larger planning report; we can link to the report and point people to the executive summary, which contains the same information. Ideally we'd cite it with a DOI, but I couldn't dig one up for this particular document. I found many URLs pointing to this report, but they all end up redirecting to this one (and it looks somewhat official). Signed-off-by: Jeff King --- This one and the next are in somewhat of a historical document, so maybe it's better to leave it as-is. We _do_ build it via "make html", though. Documentation/git-bisect-lk2009.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/git-bisect-lk2009.txt b/Documentation/git-bisect-lk2009.txt index 716d66d43..263a853fa 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-bisect-lk2009.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-bisect-lk2009.txt @@ -1347,7 +1347,7 @@ author to given a talk and for publishing this paper. References ---------- -- [[[1]]] http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/n02-10.htm['Software Errors Cost U.S. Economy $59.5 Billion Annually'. Nist News Release.] +- [[[1]]] https://www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/documents/director/planning/report02-3.pdf['The Economic Impacts of Inadequate Infratructure for Software Testing'. Nist Planning Report 02-3], see Executive Summary and Chapter 8. - [[[2]]] http://java.sun.com/docs/codeconv/html/CodeConventions.doc.html#16712['Code Conventions for the Java Programming Language'. Sun Microsystems.] - [[[3]]] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_maintenance['Software maintenance'. Wikipedia.] - [[[4]]] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/45195/[Junio C Hamano. 'Automated bisect success story'. Gmane.] -- 2.13.0.rc0.363.g8726c260e