From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D46E1FC19 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 02:17:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937029AbdCYCRS (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 22:17:18 -0400 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:54884 "EHLO mx1.riseup.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936815AbdCYCRQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 22:17:16 -0400 Received: from piha.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F9491A194D; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 02:17:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1490408235; bh=pgXYTirKcVXbvgSu3yka82U5io5bsVczDKpet4vj8Ho=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hBY+r1twJCNeCo08UgZ+tAoTlNwOgJrCKe6/02gz8dqjMEYjbspXCa32Kv3fIQ2hv 3QSPCdjvMlUjzM80s4GgBY+/SzdciPvuMGmIUnzTk8pYP5x8Jzpf1LPUCS6hztpmeS AOjAzkkRURa2ffseiHrLjqmyCsBmLSzRWrejACdk= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: pickfire) with ESMTPSA id D9BBC1C01A6 Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 10:17:03 +0800 From: Inaw Tham To: Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, sbeller@google.com Subject: Re: Re: Re: GSoC Project | Convert interactive rebase to C Message-ID: <20170325021703.Tjq7i-hO7%pickfire@riseup.net> References: <20170320164154.xBcU6rG0C%pickfire@riseup.net> <20170321060526.sXz0cdJwc%pickfire@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: Mail-Followup-To: sbeller@google.com, Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de, git@vger.kernel.org Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Tue, 21 Mar 2017, Ivan Tham wrote: > > Stefan Beller wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Ivan Tham wrote: > > > > I am Ivan Tham. Currently studying in Computer Science in APIIT > > > > Malaysia. I am interested particapate in Google Summer of Code 2017 > > > > under git organization. I would like to attempt "Add more builtin > > > > patterns for userdiff" particularly for shell for my microproject. > > > > > > I'd love to see proper shell support! Although there is already some > > > support for shell (by looking at diffs on our test suite) ? So I am > > > not sure what there is left to do? Can you clarify what you're trying > > > there? > > > > Are you sure about that? From what I had looked into userdiff.c, there > > is no support for shell. There just a recent patch for [go patterns][0]. > > Or perhaps I should have rename it as "userdiff.c: patterns for "shell" > > language"? > > I also could not find any shell patterns in the userdiff code... Thanks a lot for replying me, I thought no one was intereted. :D > > > > I am interested to work on "Convert interactive rebase to C" > > > > > > +cc Johannes, who recently worked on rebase and the sequencer. > > Glad you are interested! Please note that large parts of the interactive > rebase are already in C now, but there is enough work left in that corner. Glad to hear that, I would really like to see interactive rebase in C. > > > > aiming to port most builtins stuff to C in which we can reduce the > > > > size of git. Additionally, I would also like to convert scripts to > > > > builtins as an additional milestone. > > Careful. It is a ton of work to get the rebase -i conversion done, and > then a ton of work to get it integrated. That will fill 3 months, very > easily. My main aim is to reduce the extra dependency of perl, but planning to start with rebase, can I make that an optional task where I can help out after I had completed my main task during gsoc? > > > > What do you think of these projects? Would it collide with Valery > > > > Tolstov's Shell to Builtins proposal? > > I missed that proposal, and could only find submodule-related mails on the > public-inbox server. Care to provide a pointer? > > > > Curious why all people ask about colliding with Valerys proposal here? > > > I do not think it would collide, as submodules and rebase are very > > > different areas of the code base. > > Indeed ;-) Cheers, Ivan Tham