From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CA01FBEC for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 10:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754220AbdCIKiU (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2017 05:38:20 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:41172 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752982AbdCIKiP (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2017 05:38:15 -0500 Received: (qmail 8268 invoked by uid 109); 9 Mar 2017 10:38:14 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 10:38:14 +0000 Received: (qmail 28546 invoked by uid 111); 9 Mar 2017 10:38:23 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 05:38:23 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 09 Mar 2017 05:38:12 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 05:38:12 -0500 From: Jeff King To: Guillaume Wenzek Cc: Junio C Hamano , Karthik Nayak , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BUG Report: git branch ignore --no-abbrev flag Message-ID: <20170309103812.skwmyn4bmkxjwjl4@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 10:44:42AM +0100, Guillaume Wenzek wrote: > The full version number is "2.12.0.246.ga2ecc84866" but I don't think > that's an official number, I'm using my company (Google) apt > repository. That's built from the commit at a2ecc84866, which is in the "next" branch (and is 246 commits ahead of v2.12.0). So that explains why you are seeing the behavior. The code _isn't_ in v2.12.0, but you're running a much more recent version. -Peff