git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Jeff Hostetler <jeffhost@microsoft.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, markbt@efaref.net,
	benpeart@microsoft.com, jonathantanmy@google.com,
	Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] pack-objects: add --partial-by-size=n --partial-special
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 02:31:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170309073117.g3br5btsfwntcdpe@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1488994685-37403-3-git-send-email-jeffhost@microsoft.com>

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 05:37:57PM +0000, Jeff Hostetler wrote:

> From: Jeff Hostetler <git@jeffhostetler.com>
> 
> Teach pack-objects to omit blobs from the generated packfile.
> 
> When the --partial-by-size=n[kmg] argument is used, only blobs
> smaller than the requested size are included.  When n is zero,
> no blobs are included.
> 
> When the --partial-special argument is used, git special files,
> such as ".gitattributes" and ".gitignores" are included.
> 
> When both are given, the union of two are included.

I understand why one would want to do:

  --partial-by-size=100 --partial-special

and get the union. The first one restricts, and the second one adds back
in. But I don't understand why "--partial-special" by itself makes any
sense. Wouldn't we already be including all blobs, and it would be a
noop?


Also, I was thinking a bit on Junio's comment elsewhere on whether
read_object_list_from_stdin() should do the same limiting. I think the
answer is "probably not", because whoever is generating that object list
can cull the set. You could do it today with something like:

  git rev-list --objects HEAD |
  git cat-file --batch-check='%(objectsize) %(objecttype) %(objectname) %(rest)' |
  perl -lne 's/^(\d+) (\S+) //; print if $2 ne "blob" || $1 < 100' |
  git pack-objects

But if we are going to add this --partial-by-size for the pack-objects
traversal, shouldn't we just add it to rev-list? Then:

  git rev-list --objects --partial-by-size=100 --partial-special |
  git pack-objects

works, and you should get it in the pack-objects basically for free (I
think you'd have to allow through the "--partial" arguments on stdin,
and make sure the rev-list implementation is done via
traverse_commit_list).

As a bonus, I suspect it would make the --partial-special path-handling
easier, because you'd see each tree entry rather than the fully
constructed path (so no more monkeying around with "/").

> diff --git a/builtin/pack-objects.c b/builtin/pack-objects.c
> index 7e052bb..2df2f49 100644
> --- a/builtin/pack-objects.c
> +++ b/builtin/pack-objects.c
> @@ -77,6 +77,10 @@ static unsigned long cache_max_small_delta_size = 1000;
>  
>  static unsigned long window_memory_limit = 0;
>  
> +static signed long partial_by_size = -1;

I would have expected this to be an off_t, though I think
OPT_MAGNITUDE() forces you into "unsigned long". I guess it is nothing
new for Git; we use "unsigned long" for single object sizes elsewhere,
so systems with a 32-bit long are out of luck anyway until we fix that.

The signed "long" here is unfortunate, as it limits us to 2G on such
systems. Maybe it is not worth worrying too much about. The "big object"
threshold is usually around 500MB. I think the failure behavior is not
great, though (asking for "3G" would go negative and effectively be
ignored).

I think handling all cases would involve swapping out OPT_MAGNITUDE()
for a special callback that writes the "yes, the user set this" bit in a
separate variable.

-Peff

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-09  8:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-08 17:37 [PATCH 00/10] RFC Partial Clone and Fetch Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 01/10] pack-objects: eat CR in addition to LF after fgets Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-09  7:01   ` Jeff King
2017-03-09 15:46     ` Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 02/10] pack-objects: add --partial-by-size=n --partial-special Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 18:47   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-08 20:21     ` Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-09  7:04       ` Jeff King
2017-03-10 17:58         ` Brandon Williams
2017-03-10 18:03           ` Jeff King
2017-03-10 19:38             ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-10 19:47               ` Jeff King
2017-03-09  7:31   ` Jeff King [this message]
2017-03-09 18:26     ` Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 03/10] pack-objects: test for --partial-by-size --partial-special Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-09  7:35   ` Jeff King
2017-03-09 18:11   ` Johannes Sixt
2017-03-08 17:37 ` [PATCH 04/10] upload-pack: add partial (sparse) fetch Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-09  7:48   ` Jeff King
2017-03-09 18:34     ` Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-09 19:09       ` Jeff King
2017-03-08 17:38 ` [PATCH 05/10] fetch-pack: add partial-by-size and partial-special Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 17:38 ` [PATCH 06/10] rev-list: add --allow-partial option to relax connectivity checks Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 18:55   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-03-08 20:10     ` Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-09  7:56       ` Jeff King
2017-03-09 18:38         ` Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 17:38 ` [PATCH 07/10] index-pack: add --allow-partial option to relax blob existence checks Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 17:38 ` [PATCH 08/10] fetch: add partial-by-size and partial-special arguments Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 17:38 ` [PATCH 09/10] clone: " Jeff Hostetler
2017-03-08 17:38 ` [PATCH 10/10] ls-partial: created command to list missing blobs Jeff Hostetler
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-03-08 18:50 [PATCH 00/10] RFC Partial Clone and Fetch git
2017-03-08 18:50 ` [PATCH 02/10] pack-objects: add --partial-by-size=n --partial-special git

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170309073117.g3br5btsfwntcdpe@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=benpeart@microsoft.com \
    --cc=git@jeffhostetler.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=jeffhost@microsoft.com \
    --cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
    --cc=markbt@efaref.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).