From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D861FAF4 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 15:51:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754790AbdBHPvg (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:51:36 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:51537 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752923AbdBHPvf (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:51:35 -0500 Received: (qmail 7163 invoked by uid 109); 8 Feb 2017 15:43:59 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 15:43:59 +0000 Received: (qmail 32290 invoked by uid 111); 8 Feb 2017 15:44:04 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 10:44:04 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 08 Feb 2017 10:43:57 -0500 Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:43:57 -0500 From: Jeff King To: Matthieu Moy Cc: git , Pranit Bauva , Lars Schneider , Christian Couder , Carlos =?utf-8?Q?Mart=C3=ADn?= Nieto , Johannes Schindelin , Thomas Gummerer , Siddharth Kannan Subject: Re: GSoC 2017: application open, deadline = February 9, 2017 Message-ID: <20170208154357.sjmqs2wlxlnnllvf@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20170125204504.ebw2sa4uokfwwfnt@sigill.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 03:54:25PM +0100, Matthieu Moy wrote: > >> * We need to write the application, i.e. essentially polish and update > >> the text here: https://git.github.io/SoC-2016-Org-Application/ and > >> update the list of project ideas and microprojects : > >> https://git.github.io/SoC-2017-Ideas/ > >> https://git.github.io/SoC-2016-Microprojects/ > > > > That can be done incrementally by people who care (especially mentors) > > over the next week or so, and doesn't require any real admin > > coordination. If it happens and the result looks good, then the > > application process is pretty straightforward. > > > > If it doesn't, then we probably ought not to participate in GSoC. > > OK, it seems the last message did not raise a lot of enthousiasm (unless > I missed some off-list discussion at Git-Merge?). Nope, there was no discussion that I'm aware of. > The application deadline is tomorrow. I think it's time to admit that we > won't participate this year, unless someone steps in really soon. Yes, I'd agree with that. Outreachy folks asked if we were interested in participating, but I think it has roughly the same pre-requisite lists for ideas and microprojects. > If we don't participate, I'll add a disclaimer at the top of the > SoC-related pages on git.github.io to make sure students don't waste > time preparing an application. Good idea. -Peff