From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CD91FAFC for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 20:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752614AbdBFUcS (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2017 15:32:18 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:50082 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752449AbdBFUcR (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2017 15:32:17 -0500 Received: (qmail 30030 invoked by uid 109); 6 Feb 2017 20:32:17 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 20:32:17 +0000 Received: (qmail 18062 invoked by uid 111); 6 Feb 2017 20:32:21 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 15:32:21 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 06 Feb 2017 21:32:15 +0100 Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 21:32:15 +0100 From: Jeff King To: Samuel Lijin Cc: Duy Nguyen , "git@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: warning in tree xxx: contains zero-padded file modes Message-ID: <20170206203214.5y6ynn5co7davtrj@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 02:23:37PM -0600, Samuel Lijin wrote: > >> There are some discussions in the past [1] [2] about this. > > I think you forgot to link to [2] :p I think the [1] [2] there were recursive quotes from Duy's email. Those footnotes were: [1] http://public-inbox.org/git/%3CCAEBDL5W3DL0v=TusuB7Vg-4bWdAJh5d2Psc1N0Qe+KK3bZH3=Q@mail.gmail.com%3E/ [2] http://public-inbox.org/git/%3C20100326215600.GA10910@spearce.org%3E/ > The linked issue on bugs.debian.org has seen activity recently, which > is the main reason I mentioned it separately as still relevant: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=743227 Yeah. I think that's not quite solvable with Git as we have it now. We have fsck.* and receive.fsck.* to tweak severity levels, but no matching fetch.fsck.* for handling a push (and presumably a transfer.fsck.* to cover both fetching and pushing). So there's a potential patch series for anybody interested. -Peff