From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Cc: "git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Disallow commands from within unpopulated submodules.
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:42:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170120194224.vikzovupwqx53x2c@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kaJQefSDkV-LKxRCTtSepsNsX7U+AZqy3Z_YCd1xsmTxQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:33:45AM -0800, Stefan Beller wrote:
> > I'd rather see it in the commands themselves. Especially given the
> > "ideal" in your status example, which requires command-specific
> > knowledge.
>
> So you rather want to go bottom up, i.e. add it to each command individually
> for which it makes sense, instead of rather first having a catch-it-all like
> this and then we can have a flag similar to RUN_SETUP, e.g.
> ALLOW_IN_UNPOP_SUBMODULE, which allows commands to
> take over the responsibility to act responsibly in this case?
Yes. I know it's "less safe" in the sense that commands have to make an
effort to detect the situation, but I feel like only they'll know what
the sensible behavior is. And they can also do the check at a time when
they would be reading the index anyway.
> status may be the first command for going that route; I wonder if we'd
> want to add this feature unconditionally or only in the porcelain case.
> (In plumbing you're supposed to know what you're doing... so there is
> no need as well as our promise to not change it)
Yeah. The reason that it would be so painful to load the index
for every rev-parse is not just that it probably doesn't otherwise need
the index, but that scripts may make a _ton_ of rev-parse (or other
plumbing) calls.
One alternative would be to make the check cheaper. Could we reliably
tell from the submodule.foo.* block in the config that path "foo" is a
submodule? I think that would work after "submodule init" but not right
after "git clone". So the index really is the source of truth there.
I guess there could be an index extension "these are the gitlinks I
contain" and in theory we could read just that extension. I dunno.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-20 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-19 19:30 [RFC/PATCH] Disallow commands from within unpopulated submodules Stefan Beller
2017-01-20 19:17 ` Jeff King
2017-01-20 19:33 ` Stefan Beller
2017-01-20 19:42 ` Jeff King [this message]
2017-01-20 19:53 ` Stefan Beller
2017-01-20 20:00 ` Jeff King
2017-01-20 20:07 ` Stefan Beller
2017-01-20 21:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-20 21:48 ` Jeff King
2017-01-20 21:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-20 22:01 ` Jeff King
2017-01-20 23:22 ` Stefan Beller
2017-01-21 12:55 ` Duy Nguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170120194224.vikzovupwqx53x2c@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).