git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2017, #02; Sun, 15)
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:51:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170117205126.sckxwrchlzzmsqui@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqtw8xe8bp.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:32:26PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> 
> > That was my general impression, too. But I seem to recall it was you in
> > a nearby thread saying that:
> >
> >   if (foo)
> > 	bar();
> >   else {
> >         one();
> > 	two();
> >   }
> >
> > was wrong. Maybe I misunderstood.
> 
> If it were a new code written like the above, that would have been
> fine.  If a new code written with both sides inside {}, that would
> have been fine, too.
> 
> IIRC, it was that the original had {} on both, and a patch tried to
> turn that into the above, triggering "why are we churning between
> two acceptable forms?"

Ah, OK. I didn't follow that discussion closely enough to realize that.

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-17 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-16  1:51 What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2017, #02; Sun, 15) Junio C Hamano
2017-01-16  6:56 ` Johannes Sixt
2017-01-16  7:48   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-16 12:52   ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-16 16:04     ` Jeff King
2017-01-16 17:06       ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-16 20:33         ` Johannes Sixt
2017-01-16 21:44           ` Jeff King
2017-01-17 19:17             ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-18  6:50               ` Johannes Sixt
2017-01-18 19:12                 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-19 16:12                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-16 22:00         ` Jeff King
2017-01-16 22:08           ` [PATCH] CodingGuidelines: clarify multi-line brace style Jeff King
2017-01-17 19:39             ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-17 20:05               ` Jeff King
2017-01-17 21:41                 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-17  1:33           ` What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2017, #02; Sun, 15) Jacob Keller
2017-01-17  7:52             ` Jeff King
2017-01-17 19:20           ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-17 19:36             ` Jeff King
2017-01-17 20:32               ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-17 20:51                 ` Jeff King [this message]
2017-01-16 11:28 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-17 19:45   ` Junio C Hamano
2017-01-18 13:54     ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-16 11:40 ` Johannes Schindelin
2017-01-18  1:05 ` [PATCHv3 4/4] unpack-trees: support super-prefix option Stefan Beller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170117205126.sckxwrchlzzmsqui@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).