Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] pathspec cleanup

[Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>]

On 01/04, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/dir.c b/dir.c
> > index 15f7c9993..e8ddd7f8a 100644
> > --- a/dir.c
> > +++ b/dir.c
> > @@ -1353,6 +1353,15 @@ static int simplify_away(const char *path, int pathlen,
> >  {
> >         int i;
> >
> > +       if (pathspec)
> > +               guard_pathspec(pathspec,
> > +                              pathspec_fromtop |
> > +                              pathspec_maxdepth |
> > +                              pathspec_literal |
> > +                              pathspec_glob |
> > +                              pathspec_icase |
> > +                              pathspec_exclude);
> 
> You have done some magic (or your MTA/editor did) to lower case
> GUARD_PATHSPEC and all the flags. The real patch looks good though, so
> no problem.

That's really odd, I was sure I just did a cut and paste.  I'll fix that
:)

> 
> > +
> >         if (!pathspec || !pathspec->nr)
> >                 return 0;
> 
> 
> Super tiny nit, if GUARD_PATHSPEC is placed after this line, then we
> don't have to check if pathspec is non-NULL. Probably not worth a
> re-roll unless somebody else finds something else.

I saw this after I sent out the series again, and I agree.  I'll move
the guard to be after this check.

> 
> >                 if (m->mnemonic)
> > -                       strbuf_addf(&sb, "'(%c)%s'", m->mnemonic, m->name);
> > +                       strbuf_addf(&sb, "'%s' (mnemonic: '%c')",
> > +                                   m->name, m->mnemonic);
> 
> .. and that somebody might be me :) we need to mark "mnemonic" for
> translation. Putting _() around the string would do.
> 
> Ideally I would give the translators the whole sentence so they can
> have good context (and good translation as a result). But since we
> potentially concatenate multiple unsupported magic in the string,
> there's no way to provide one (or a few) fixed string(s) at compile
> time. So let's just _() it and leave it at that.

Will do!

-- 
Brandon Williams