From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083991FBB0 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 22:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753108AbcLEWy0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2016 17:54:26 -0500 Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net ([64.71.152.64]:36642 "EHLO dcvr.yhbt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753085AbcLEWyZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2016 17:54:25 -0500 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921171FBB0; Mon, 5 Dec 2016 22:54:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 22:54:24 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: Juergen Kosel Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Feature request: Set git svn options in .git/config file Message-ID: <20161205225424.GA29771@starla> References: <1936940c-c4c8-540c-eb99-b434e8d32d6c@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1936940c-c4c8-540c-eb99-b434e8d32d6c@gmx.de> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Juergen Kosel wrote: > Therefore I believe, that it would be the best solution to store the > settings of --add-author-from, --use-log-author and maybe > --authors-prog in the .git/config file. Actually, "svn.authorsProg" is already documented as a config option for --authors-prog. It's been a while since I looked at this, but in git-svn, all the "--xxx-yyy" command-line options should be available under the appropriate "svn.xxxYyy" config key. So, can you confirm that svn.addAuthorFrom and svn.useLogAuthor config keys work and can be documented? Even better would be for you to provide a patch to the documentation :) Otherwise, I can write one up sometime this week. Thanks.