Re: [PATCH] transport: add core.allowProtocol config option

[Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>]

On 11/03, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 11:45:38AM -0700, Brandon Williams wrote:
> 
> > On 11/03, Jeff King wrote:
> > > 
> > > So this seems like a reasonable direction to me. It obviously needs
> > > documentation and tests. Arguably there should be a fallback "allow"
> > > value when a protocol is not mentioned in the config so that you could
> > > convert the default from "user" to "never" if you wanted your config to
> > > specify a pure whitelist.
> > 
> > Yes I agree there should probably be a fallback value of 'never' maybe?
> > What you currently have preserves the behavior of what git does
> > now, if we did instead have a fallback of 'never' it would break current
> > users who don't already use GIT_ALLOW_PROTOCOL (well only if they use
> > crazy protocols).  We could ease into it though and start with default
> > to allow and then transition to a true whitelist sometime after this
> > change has been made?
> 
> I don't see the value in moving the out-of-the-box install to any
> default except "user". Right now the experience of using a third-party
> helper is something like:
> 
>   cp git-remote-hg /somewhere/in/your/PATH
>   git clone hg::whatever
> 
> We restrict its use in submodules by default, which is unlikely to bite
> many people. But if we started falling back to "never" all the time,
> then that second command would break until you officially "approve"
> remote-hg in your config.
> 
> I was thinking of just something to let people decide to have that level
> of paranoia themselves (especially if they want to just set up a
> whole-system white list via the config without bothering with
> environment variables). Like:
> 
>   git config --system protocol.allow never
>   git config --system protocol.https.allow always
> 
> That behaves exactly like:
> 
>   export GIT_ALLOW_PROTOCOL=https
> 
> except it just works everywhere, without having to tweak the environment
> of every process.
> 

Ah ok, so essentially letting the user specify a default behaviour
themselves.

-- 
Brandon Williams