From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C3520229 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934712AbcJUPso (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:48:44 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:60741 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933352AbcJUPsn (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:48:43 -0400 Received: (qmail 1850 invoked by uid 109); 21 Oct 2016 15:48:43 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:48:43 +0000 Received: (qmail 4840 invoked by uid 111); 21 Oct 2016 15:49:05 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:49:05 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:48:40 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:48:40 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Jacob Keller Cc: Stefan Beller , Lars Schneider , git Subject: Re: Prove "Tests out of sequence" Error Message-ID: <20161021154840.pdmb5c3gjharsrxe@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20161021082035.xad6wfny5i6wtshh@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20161021084348.dp4jfpfownodl7nz@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20161021153534.mjed3sqhxjelxzwx@sigill.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 08:42:58AM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: > > For $HARNESS_ACTIVE with _just_ "--verbose", I don't think it would be a > > good idea to activate it. We should either silently ignore --verbose > > then, or complain and die. > > We should probably do that to make sure people realize what might > happen. I read your series and it has a good explanation of the > possible alternatives. I like the approach you chose. Thanks. Do you want to make a patch on top of my series? -Peff