From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9E61F4F8 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 21:42:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754459AbcJTVmR (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:42:17 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:60304 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753520AbcJTVmQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:42:16 -0400 Received: (qmail 4405 invoked by uid 109); 20 Oct 2016 21:42:16 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 21:42:16 +0000 Received: (qmail 30413 invoked by uid 111); 20 Oct 2016 21:42:38 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:42:38 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:42:14 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:42:14 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Stefan Beller Cc: Junio C Hamano , "git@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for git Message-ID: <20161020214213.juoxbspa7pba5vsi@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <580893d5a4736_4ed37b53181837@ss1435.mail> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:58:39AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: > > By the way, do you know who is managing the service on our end > > (e.g. approving new people to be "defect viewer")? > > I do it most of the time, but I did not start managing it. > And I have been pretty lax/liberal about handing out rights to do stuff, > because I did not want to tip on anyone's toes giving to few rights > and thereby annoying them. I also do this, though I admit with more urgency when I recognize the name as somebody who has showed up on the git list. I wish there was a flag to simply make the results public. There is no point in anybody logging in just to view them, but I don't think Coverity makes that an option. -Peff