From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488F91F4F8 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 16:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754013AbcJKQrv (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2016 12:47:51 -0400 Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de ([80.67.18.44]:51423 "EHLO smtprelay02.ispgateway.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753439AbcJKQrt (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2016 12:47:49 -0400 Received: from [84.131.249.130] (helo=book.hvoigt.net) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1bu0DR-00076v-5v; Tue, 11 Oct 2016 18:47:45 +0200 Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 18:47:43 +0200 From: Heiko Voigt To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] clean up confusing suggestion for commit references Message-ID: <20161011164743.GA78613@book.hvoigt.net> References: <20161007095638.GA55445@book.hvoigt.net> <20161007143200.qw77pdsymbdmjhbw@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20161010182623.hsczlsfc6oaa2byj@sigill.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Df-Sender: aHZvaWd0QGh2b2lndC5uZXQ= Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:14:14PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King writes: > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:24:01AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > >> I no longer have preference either way myself, even though I was in > >> favor of no-quotes simply because I had an alias to produce that > >> format and was used to it. > > > > I'll admit that I don't care _that_ much and am happy to leave it up to > > individual authors, as long as nobody quotes SubmittingPatches at me as > > some kind of gospel when I use the no-quotes form. > > ;-). > > I just do not want to hear "gitk (or was it git-gui) produces quoted > form, why are you recommending no-quoted form in SubmittingPatches?" > > I'd say "use common sense; sometimes it is less confusing to read > without quotes and it is perfectly OK to do so if that is the case". I do not care about which format it should be either. I just wanted to be clear about whatever should be used. Since it seems we will allow both, I am also fine with leaving the description as it is ;-) Cheers Heiko