From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB1F20986 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 17:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752798AbcJGRw0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:52:26 -0400 Received: from mailhub.007spb.ru ([84.204.203.130]:51435 "EHLO mailhub.007spb.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751222AbcJGRwY (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Oct 2016 13:52:24 -0400 Received: from tigra.domain007.com ([192.168.2.102]) by mailhub.007spb.ru (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4+deb7u1) with SMTP id u97HqKTu029863; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 20:52:21 +0300 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 20:52:20 +0300 From: Konstantin Khomoutov To: Konstantin Khomoutov Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: "Purposes, Concepts,Misfits, and a Redesign of Git" (a research paper) Message-Id: <20161007205220.e7cc582a042f12cd13b6aef7@domain007.com> In-Reply-To: <20160930191413.002049b94b3908b15881b77f@domain007.com> References: <20160930191413.002049b94b3908b15881b77f@domain007.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 (www.roaringpenguin.com/mimedefang) on 192.168.2.20 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 19:14:13 +0300 Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > The "It Will Never Work in Theory" blog has just posted a summary of a > study which tried to identify shortcomings in the design of Git. > > In the hope it might be interesting, I post this summary here. > URL: http://neverworkintheory.org/2016/09/30/rethinking-git.html I think it would be cool if someone among subscribers could post a link to our discussion thread [2] back onto that page. Unfortunatrly that requires a Disqus login which I don't have, so may be someone in possession of such login could do that? ;-) 2. https://public-inbox.org/git/ce42f934-4a94-fa29-cff0-5ebb0f004eb5@gmail.com/T/#e95875b7940512b432ab2e29b3dd50ca448df9720