From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628461FD99 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 09:49:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755292AbcH1Jts (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Aug 2016 05:49:48 -0400 Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net ([64.71.152.64]:40632 "EHLO dcvr.yhbt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755236AbcH1Jtr (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Aug 2016 05:49:47 -0400 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5C01FD99; Sun, 28 Aug 2016 09:49:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 09:49:46 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: Jakub =?utf-8?B?TmFyxJlic2tp?= Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Doug Rathbone , David Bainbridge , Stefan Beller Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposed questions for "Git User's Survey 2016" Message-ID: <20160828094946.GA11722@dcvr> References: <91a2ffbe-a73b-fbb9-96da-9aea4d439e5a@gmail.com> <20160826061500.GA22213@dcvr> <6d171c23-65f6-5f67-7d80-051f2dfe8678@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <6d171c23-65f6-5f67-7d80-051f2dfe8678@gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jakub Narębski wrote: > W dniu 26.08.2016 o 08:15, Eric Wong pisze: > > > Not directly-related to the survey questions, but can you ensure > > it's accessible to folks without JavaScript/graphics, and > > perhaps also ensure it is on a host that is Tor-friendly? > > I plan on using Survs.com (where we have Premium account for free, > thanks to Survs admins). It has good online analysis tools, allows > to download results in easy parseable format[1], and has support > for multiple channels. > > [1]: https://github.com/jnareb/GitSurvey-scripts > > > It is possible to have a channel without JavaScript and without > cookies (anonymous), at the cost of having to fill the survey > in one go (without cookies and JavaScript you cannot go back > to fill more questions, or change your mind about answers). > The main page of survey would have a link to JavaScript-free > version, and all announcements (by me) would include it. Thanks. > There would be no graphics that are not purely optional > (decorative); probably there would be just a logo. > > I'm not sure how Tor-friendly is this host. I was able to get to Survs.com using Tor (maybe it was just luck with a new exit). > > Graphics setups often require non-Free firmware or drivers for > > acceptable performance; and there are also visually-impaired > > users who will need screen readers or Braille. > > A question: would it be better to have the whole survey one one > large page, or have it split into pages (with fever questions > per page)? I prefer single. One could get one page, take take time and let the connection drop/fail, and send it over all in one go. With multiple pages, one would have to reconnect for every POST. (fittingly, my connection failed writing this message a few days ago and I only got back around to it)