From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A131B1F859 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753282AbcHPOtN (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:49:13 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:56238 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752021AbcHPOtM (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:49:12 -0400 Received: (qmail 11774 invoked by uid 109); 16 Aug 2016 14:48:24 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 14:48:24 +0000 Received: (qmail 26787 invoked by uid 111); 16 Aug 2016 14:48:26 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:48:26 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:48:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:48:22 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Christian Couder Cc: git , Junio C Hamano , Christian Couder Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] limit the size of the packs we receive Message-ID: <20160816144821.tbktj3l7agnsqddw@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20160816081701.29949-1-chriscool@tuxfamily.org> <20160816131145.apq77nc2x7wb7lba@sigill.intra.peff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:44:01PM +0200, Christian Couder wrote: >> [sizes and signedness of off_t] > I can add something along your explanations in the commit message if > it is prefered. I think it's probably OK without it. -Peff