From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Martin Fick <mfick@codeaurora.org>,
Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>,
Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
repo-discuss@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: storing cover letter of a patch series?
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 08:12:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160807080857-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqy44bxm0h.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 08:39:58AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:39:49AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> The problem with "empty commit trick" is that it is a commit whose
> >> sole purpose is to describe the series, and its presence makes it
> >> clear where the series ends, but the topology does not tell where
> >> the series begins, so it is an unsatisifactory half-measure.
> >
> > Actually, when using topic branches the series always ends at head, so
> > it's better to keep the empty commit where series begins.
>
> But that would mean that you would need to destroy and recreate more
> commits than you would need to. If you have a five-commit series
> (with the bottom "description" one, you would have six commits) and
> you are already happy with the bottom two but want to update the
> third one, you wuld have to "rebase -i" all six of them, reword the
> bottom "description" to adjust it to describe the new version of the
> third one _before_ you even do the actual update of the third one.
>
> That somehow feels backwards, and that backward-ness comes from the
> fact that you abused a single-parent commit for the purpose it is
> not meant to be used (i.e. they are to describe individual changes),
> because you did not find a better existing mechanism (and I suspect
> there isn't any, in which case the solution is to invent one, not
> abusing an existing mechanism that is not suited for it).
A flag that marks a commit "beginning of series" then?
> If this were part of a workflow like this, I would understand it:
>
> * Build a N-commit series on a topic.
>
> * You keep a "local integration testing" branch ("lit"), forked
> from a mainline and updated _every time_ you do something to your
> topics. You may or may not publish this branch. This is the
> aggregation of what you locally have done, a convenient place to
> test individual topics together before they get published.
This seems to assume topic branches. I know you use them,
but not overyone does, I don't.
> * A new topic, when you merge it to the "lit" branch, you describe
> the cover as the merge commit message.
>
> * When you updated an existing topic, you tell a tool like "rebase
> -i -p" to recreate "lit" branch on top of the mainline. This
> would give you an opportunity to update the cover.
Combining patchsets might need conflict resolution,
redoing this each time might be a lot of work.
> Now the tool support for the last one is the missing piece. In
> addition to what "rebase -i -p" would, it at least need to
> automatically figure out which topics have been updated, so that
> their merge commit log messages need to be given in the editor to
> update, while carrying over the merge log message for other topics
> intact (by default).
>
> With that, you should also be able to teach "format-patch --cover"
> to take these merge messages on "lit" into account when it creates
> the cover letter.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-07 5:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-10 16:28 storing cover letter of a patch series? Jacob Keller
2015-09-10 17:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-09-10 18:02 ` Martin Fick
2015-09-10 18:38 ` Jacob Keller
2015-09-10 18:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-09-11 22:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-04 23:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-08-05 15:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-05 21:20 ` Martin Fick
2016-08-05 21:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-06 16:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-07 5:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2016-08-07 9:52 ` John Keeping
2016-08-07 10:42 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-08-08 17:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-09 7:12 ` Michael J Gruber
2015-09-10 18:32 ` Jacob Keller
2015-09-10 18:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-09-10 18:46 ` Jacob Keller
2015-09-10 20:09 ` Philip Oakley
2015-09-10 21:03 ` Jacob Keller
2016-08-04 23:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-09-10 18:58 ` Johannes Schindelin
2015-09-10 21:00 ` Jacob Keller
2015-09-10 21:21 ` Johannes Schindelin
2015-09-10 22:20 ` Philip Oakley
2015-09-12 22:51 ` [PATCH] doc: show usage of branch description Philip Oakley
2015-09-12 23:44 ` Jacob Keller
2015-09-14 12:01 ` Philip Oakley
2015-09-14 13:24 ` Philip Oakley
2015-09-14 17:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-09-15 16:06 ` Philip Oakley
2015-09-15 19:10 ` Philip Oakley
2015-09-14 14:10 ` [PATCH v2] " Philip Oakley
2015-09-11 8:30 ` storing cover letter of a patch series? Chris Packham
2015-09-18 4:03 ` Simon Glass
2016-08-08 17:27 ` Stefan Beller
2016-08-08 20:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-13 8:49 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-08-14 7:15 ` Jacob Keller
2016-08-15 6:28 ` Stefan Beller
2016-08-15 6:38 ` Jacob Keller
2016-08-15 6:49 ` Stefan Beller
2016-08-15 6:52 ` Jacob Keller
2016-08-15 9:40 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-08-15 12:37 ` Philip Oakley
2016-08-15 13:30 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-08-15 13:47 ` John Keeping
2016-08-15 20:09 ` Jacob Keller
2016-08-15 20:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-15 23:01 ` Jacob Keller
2016-08-15 20:46 ` Philip Oakley
2016-08-16 3:45 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-08-16 5:26 ` Jacob Keller
2016-08-16 6:45 ` Duy Nguyen
2016-08-16 15:52 ` Jacob Keller
2016-08-16 21:29 ` Philip Oakley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160807080857-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jacob.keller@gmail.com \
--cc=mfick@codeaurora.org \
--cc=repo-discuss@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).