From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5670120193 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 20:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965230AbcHDUSL (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:18:11 -0400 Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net ([64.71.152.64]:40920 "EHLO dcvr.yhbt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758987AbcHDUSL (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:18:11 -0400 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACFDD20228; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 20:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 20:17:51 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: Stefan Beller Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Junio C Hamano , Git Mailing List , Eric Sunshine , Jeff King , Johannes Sixt , Duy Nguyen , Jakub =?utf-8?B?TmFyxJlic2tp?= Subject: Re: patch submission process, was Re: [PATCH v6 06/16] merge_recursive: abort properly upon errors Message-ID: <20160804201751.GA9592@starla> References: <8ff71aba37be979f05abf88f467ec932aa522bdd.1470051326.git.johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Stefan Beller wrote: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Johannes Schindelin > wrote: > > I guess I have no really good idea yet, either, how to retain the ease of > > access of sending mails to the list, yet somehow keep a strong tie with > > the original data stored in Git. > > Does it have to be email? Transmitting text could be solved > differently as well. I've thought a lot about this over the years still think email is the least bad. Anti-spam tools for other messaging systems are far behind, proprietary, or non-existent. bugzilla.kernel.org has been hit hard lately and I see plenty of bug-tracker-to-mail spam as a result from projects that use web-based bug trackers. And email spam filtering isn't even that great (and I think it needs to be better for IPv6 and .onion adoption since much of it is still IPv4-oriented blacklisting). I guess a blockchain (*coin) implementation might work (like hashcash is used for email anti-spam), but the ones I've glanced at all look like a bigger waste of electricity than email filters. Of course, centralized systems are unacceptable to me; and with that I'll never claim any network service I run will be reliable :)