From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726E61F744 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:02:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753960AbcGTNCh (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:02:37 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:47425 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753391AbcGTNCf (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:02:35 -0400 Received: (qmail 7390 invoked by uid 102); 20 Jul 2016 13:02:35 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:02:35 -0400 Received: (qmail 20261 invoked by uid 107); 20 Jul 2016 13:02:58 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.1.3) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:02:58 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 20 Jul 2016 07:02:32 -0600 Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 07:02:32 -0600 From: Jeff King To: Jakub =?utf-8?B?TmFyxJlic2tp?= Cc: Git Mailing List Subject: Re: topological index field for commit objects Message-ID: <20160720130231.GB17469@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20160629205647.GA25987@sigill.intra.peff.net> <5774426F.3090000@gmail.com> <20160629220049.GA4416@sigill.intra.peff.net> <578EC0CA.8060501@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <578EC0CA.8060501@gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 02:07:38AM +0200, Jakub Narębski wrote: > W dniu 2016-06-30 o 00:00, Jeff King pisze: > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:49:35PM +0200, Jakub Narębski wrote: > > >> Do Git use EWAH / EWOK bitmaps for reachability analysis, or is it still > >> limited to object counting? > > > > At GitHub we are using them for --contains analysis, along with mass > > ahead/behind (e.g., as in https://github.com/gitster/git/branches). My > > plan is to send patches upstream, but they need some cleanup first. > > Ping. have you got time to clean up those patches? No, I haven't. Don't hold your breath; it's something I hope to work on in the next 6 months, not the next 6 weeks. -Peff