From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122B81FE4E for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754117AbcGLOGI (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:06:08 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:43462 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751769AbcGLOGH (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:06:07 -0400 Received: (qmail 4399 invoked by uid 102); 12 Jul 2016 14:06:07 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:06:07 -0400 Received: (qmail 2979 invoked by uid 107); 12 Jul 2016 14:06:27 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:06:27 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:06:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:06:03 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Anders Kaseorg Cc: Andreas Schwab , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.9.1 Message-ID: <20160712140603.GC613@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <87lh17kgdy.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <20160711235417.GA26163@sigill.intra.peff.net> <57843C98.7020200@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57843C98.7020200@mit.edu> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 08:40:56PM -0400, Anders Kaseorg wrote: > On 07/11/2016 07:54 PM, Jeff King wrote: > > Yes, that's somewhat the point of the test. > > > > How does it fail for you (what does it look like with "-v")? We may be > > able to check for an outcome that matches both cases. > > On Ubuntu i386 and Ubuntu armhf, I get the following verbose output from > t0006-date.sh: > > > expecting success: > echo "$time -> $expect" >expect && > test-date show:$format "$time" >actual && > test_cmp expect actual > > --- expect 2016-07-11 23:20:55.835136188 +0000 > +++ actual 2016-07-11 23:20:55.835136188 +0000 > @@ -1 +1 @@ > -5758122296 -0400 -> 2152-06-19 18:24:56 -0400 > +5758122296 -0400 -> 2038-01-18 23:14:07 -0400 Thank you for this, by the way. Your comment got drowned out by the rest of the thread, but this would have been very helpful for me in writing a patch (fortunately Dscho beat me to it, so I did not have to. :) ). -Peff