From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] git-fetch.txt: document fetch output Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 12:55:03 -0400 Message-ID: <20160603165502.GA1733@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20160522112019.26516-1-pclouds@gmail.com> <20160603110843.15434-1-pclouds@gmail.com> <20160603110843.15434-2-pclouds@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 03 19:02:38 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b8sNT-0008Io-Je for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 18:55:19 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932855AbcFCQzH convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2016 12:55:07 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:48615 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932673AbcFCQzG (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2016 12:55:06 -0400 Received: (qmail 22969 invoked by uid 102); 3 Jun 2016 16:55:05 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 12:55:05 -0400 Received: (qmail 23659 invoked by uid 107); 3 Jun 2016 16:55:13 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 12:55:13 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 03 Jun 2016 12:55:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160603110843.15434-2-pclouds@gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 06:08:41PM +0700, Nguy=E1=BB=85n Th=C3=A1i Ng=E1= =BB=8Dc Duy wrote: > This patch is a copy from git-push.txt, modified a bit because the > flag '-' means different things in push (delete) and fetch (tag > update). We probably should unify the documents at some point in > future. This is stderr output from a porcelain. I don't think we make any promises about the format, and since we're changing other bits, perhaps now is a good time to unify the "-" handling. > +The status of the push is output in tabular form, with each line > +representing the status of a single ref. Each line is of the form: Like Marc, I wondered what this means. :) I know that there have been different status outputs from transport.c and fetch.c in the past, but = I thought we had unified a lot of that. If we haven't, it seems like a good time to do so (and I'd prefer fixing to documenting quirks, when it's something that isn't plumbing). -Peff