From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: t7610-mergetool.sh test failure Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 16:01:23 -0400 Message-ID: <20160527200122.GA26608@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20160525231615.GC2634@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160526015114.GA12851@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160527044027.GA26143@gmail.com> <20160527050054.GA25774@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160527182444.GA1871@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: David Aguilar , Armin Kunaschik , Git List To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 27 22:01:33 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b6Nwo-0000Hb-SG for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 27 May 2016 22:01:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756222AbcE0UB0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 May 2016 16:01:26 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:45409 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752616AbcE0UBZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 May 2016 16:01:25 -0400 Received: (qmail 10260 invoked by uid 102); 27 May 2016 20:01:25 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 27 May 2016 16:01:25 -0400 Received: (qmail 31977 invoked by uid 107); 27 May 2016 20:01:30 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 27 May 2016 16:01:30 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 27 May 2016 16:01:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:58:15PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Jeff King wrote: > > Which perhaps shows that maybe some people would > > see a performance regression if we moved from /tmp to a slower > > filesystem (e.g., especially people whose git clone is on NFS or > > something). > > Yup, but they would be using "--root" already if NFS bothers them; > having TMPDIR pointing somewhere in it would not hurt them, I > would think. Yeah, but that is not quite the same as "in the source directory" (i.e., they would not notice via "git status" later if cruft was left in their --root path). But I guess people not using "--root" would, and that may be good enough. -Peff