From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] travis-ci: build documentation Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:14:29 -0400 Message-ID: <20160429121429.GB27952@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1461922534-49293-1-git-send-email-larsxschneider@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr, stefan.naewe@atlas-elektronik.com, gitster@pobox.com To: larsxschneider@gmail.com X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 29 14:14:43 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aw7Ji-00052S-Ei for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:14:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753402AbcD2MOd (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:14:33 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([50.56.180.127]:59012 "HELO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753274AbcD2MOc (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:14:32 -0400 Received: (qmail 2047 invoked by uid 102); 29 Apr 2016 12:14:31 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:14:31 -0400 Received: (qmail 20488 invoked by uid 107); 29 Apr 2016 12:14:33 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with SMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:14:33 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:14:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1461922534-49293-1-git-send-email-larsxschneider@gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:35:34AM +0200, larsxschneider@gmail.com wrote: > +# The follow numbers need to be adjusted when new documentation is added. > +test_file_count html 233 > +test_file_count xml 171 > +test_file_count 1 152 This seems like it will be really flaky and a pain in the future. I'm not really sure what it's accomplishing, either. The earlier steps would complain if something failed to render, wouldn't they? At some point we have to have some faith in "make doc". -Peff